Cem Ilkel vs Raul Brancaccio — Bergamo CH Round of 16

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR5
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1422Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
Ilkel C.
6-1 7-6
Brancaccio R.
Ilkel C.
6772
Brancaccio R.
1620

Cem Ilkel defeated Raul Brancaccio 6-1 7-6 in the Bergamo CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Raul Brancaccio came in ranked #230, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Brancaccio R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Brancaccio R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Brancaccio R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Brancaccio R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
11
Break points saved·Even
49
49
Break points won·Clear edge
3
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Brancaccio R.
Freshness·
—
62

Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Gaston H.[15]
4-66-46-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Tseng C.
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Marchenko I.
Crepatte B.
6-757-636-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Marcora R.[2]
7-646-3
Tseng C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Gaston H.[15]
Ilkel C.[5]
6-46-4
R16
Marchenko I.
Safiullin R.[12]
7-50-0
Marcora R.[2]
Krstin P.[13]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Baldi F.[16]
6-46-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Vanni L.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Kolar Z.[11]
6-36-4
Crepatte B.
Michalski D.
2-66-46-3
Ilkel C.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-62
Gaston H.[15]
Giustino L.[1]
6-33-66-4
R32
Crepatte B.
Ferreira Silva F.[3]
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[12]
Doumbia S.
5-4
Michalski D.
Bourgue M.[14]
6-42-0
Arnaboldi A.
Lestienne C.[6]
2-66-26-3
Marcora R.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-2
Gaston H.[15]
Grenier H.
6-36-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Galovic V.
6-26-4
Krstin P.[13]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-36-4
Tseng C.
Trungelliti M.[4]
7-646-3
Baldi F.[16]
Nejedly P.
6-36-3
Kolar Z.[11]
Vavassori A.
7-622-66-4
Marchenko I.
Moriya H.[8]
6-16-4
Ilkel C.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Viola M.[9]
6-46-4
Giustino L.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-7106-37-67
R64
Zeppieri G.
Cobolli F.
6-33-67-69
De Greef A.
Gigante M.
6-767-637-5
Galovic V.
Jecan M.
6-16-2
Nejedly P.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Molcan A.
7-616-757-5
Arnaboldi A.
Klein L.
7-646-4
Marchenko I.
Pellegrino A.
6-43-66-1
Doumbia S.
Fatic N.
6-47-64
Tseng C.
Borg L.
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Celikbilek A.
3-66-06-1
Vanni L.
Ornago F.
6-16-2
Michalski D.
Maestrelli F.
6-24-66-2
Crepatte B.
Musetti L.
6-36-2
Durasovic V.
Nardi L.
7-56-3
Grenier H.
Pecotic M.
7-56-3
Serdarusic N.
Gakhov I.
6-37-5