Tomas Machac vs Ruben Bemelmans — Koblenz CH Semi-final

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Machac T.
6-2 6-4
Bemelmans R.
Machac T.
662
Bemelmans R.
24–

Tomas Machac defeated Ruben Bemelmans 6-2 6-4 in the Koblenz CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Bemelmans R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Bemelmans R.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Bemelmans R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Bemelmans R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
87
Break points won·Dominant
80
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-34-66-3
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kuhn N.
6-43-66-2
Machac T.
Bemelmans R.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Bemelmans R.
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Masur D.
5-77-626-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Maden Y.
4-66-46-4
Machac T.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
R16
Hanfmann Y.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.
6-26-4
Machac T.
Kopriva V.
6-36-3
Maden Y.
Kirkin E.
6-36-0
Kuzmanov D.
Brown D.
4-66-36-4
Kuhn N.
Basic M.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Griekspoor T.
5-76-36-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.
Sijsling I.
W/O
Masur D.
Safranek V.
5-77-626-2
Griekspoor T.
Gerch L.
6-42-67-63
Machac T.
Gabashvili T.
6-06-3
Halys Q.
Aubriot A.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.
Otte O.
6-47-64
Brown D.
Ignatik U.
6-46-4
Kuzmanov D.
Janvier M.
6-47-5
Marterer M.
Lenz J.
6-16-3
Kuhn N.
Bega A.
6-36-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.
6-46-4
Maden Y.
Wessels L.
3-67-656-3
Kirkin E.
Kotov P.
6-46-757-5
Bemelmans R.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-1
Mukund S.
Miedler L.
7-616-4
Hanfmann Y.
Vrbensky M.
6-776-47-65
R64
Basic M.
Mertens Y.
6-36-1
Bega A.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Vrbensky M.
Eriksson M.
6-26-2
Mukund S.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Dubrivnyy A.
Added D.
7-56-4
Aubriot A.
Pavlasek A.
6-14-66-4
Kopriva V.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Machac T.
Zima L.
6-26-2
Ignatik U.
Ehrenschneider N.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Orlov V.
6-26-1
Safranek V.
Heyman C.
6-46-2
Gerch L.
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-4
Wessels L.
Heller P.
6-36-2
Kirkin E.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-4
Marterer M.
Struvay E.
6-37-65
Sijsling I.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-64