Reilly Opelka vs Yoshihito Nishioka — New York Round of 16

New York · ATP · Round of 16
Reilly Opelka
USA3
Reilly Opelka
#115ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2020
hard
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN
Yoshihito Nishioka
#176ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Opelka R.
6-4 6-4
Nishioka Y.
Opelka R.
662
Nishioka Y.
440

Reilly Opelka defeated Yoshihito Nishioka 6-4 6-4 in the New York round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Reilly Opelka came in ranked #115, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Reilly Opelka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Reilly Opelka edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-17Delray BeachFhardReilly Opelka7-5 6-7(4) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Nishioka Y.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Opelka R.Nishioka Y.
86
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Opelka R.Nishioka Y.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
29%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
17.1
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Opelka R.Nishioka Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
84
Break points saved·Slight edge
100
95
Break points won·Dominant
1
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
98
Tiebreaks·Even
93
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[8]
Seppi A.
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Seppi A.
Jung J.
6-36-2
Edmund K.[8]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Seppi A.
Thompson J.
6-726-46-1
Jung J.
Opelka R.[3]
5-76-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Humbert U.[4]
3-66-26-4
Edmund K.[8]
Kwon S.
3-66-27-65
R16
Thompson J.
Isner J.[1]
7-626-736-3
Opelka R.[3]
Nishioka Y.
6-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Lorenzi P.
6-36-3
Humbert U.[4]
Giron M.
6-16-0
Kwon S.
Raonic M.[2]
7-646-746-4
Edmund K.[8]
Koepfer D.
6-26-4
Jung J.
Norrie C.[7]
6-46-4
Seppi A.
Johnson S.
7-646-3
R32
Seppi A.
Dzumhur D.
6-31-67-66
Nishioka Y.
Laaksonen H.
6-30-66-2
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Paul T.
6-46-2
Giron M.
Sock J.
6-36-4
Edmund K.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Koepfer D.
Schnur B.
6-46-3
Kwon S.
Soeda G.
6-26-726-3
Johnson S.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-756-37-63
Jung J.
Anderson K.
7-666-4
Norrie C.[7]
Shi B.
7-56-3
Lorenzi P.
Petrovic D.
4-66-46-0
Thompson J.
Karlovic I.
6-37-62