Mikael Torpegaard vs Michael Mmoh — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
DEN12
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2020
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA8
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Torpegaard M.
7-6 4-6 7-6
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
774772
Mmoh M.
636601

Mikael Torpegaard defeated Michael Mmoh 7-6 4-6 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Mikael Torpegaard came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Torpegaard M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Torpegaard M.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.8
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Torpegaard M.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
66
Break points saved·Dominant
35
91
Break points won·Clear edge
13
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Torpegaard M.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Torpegaard M.[12]
Watanuki Y.
6-31-66-1
Semi-finals
Watanuki Y.
Escobedo E.[9]
6-46-4
Torpegaard M.[12]
Bellucci T.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Bellucci T.
Blancaneaux G.
4-66-36-4
Watanuki Y.
Blanch U.
7-57-5
Torpegaard M.[12]
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.[9]
Kudla D.[1]
6-747-666-4
R16
Torpegaard M.[12]
Mmoh M.[8]
7-634-67-60
Blancaneaux G.
Harrison R.
6-33-66-2
Blanch U.
Cressy M.
7-665-77-64
Watanuki Y.
Mansouri S.
6-46-3
Escobedo E.[9]
Tabilo A.[5]
6-46-3
Bellucci T.
Wolf J.[6]
6-36-4
Kudla D.[1]
Korda S.[15]
6-16-3
Sarmiento R.
Aragone J.
6-47-5
R32
Watanuki Y.
Rinderknech A.[13]
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[8]
Nakashima B.
7-626-2
Aragone J.
Oconnell C.[2]
7-656-2
Sarmiento R.
Nam J.[16]
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Kamke T.[14]
6-17-62
Bellucci T.
Cid R.[10]
6-26-4
Cressy M.
Menezes J.[7]
6-47-66
Blanch U.
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Popko D.[4]
6-36-4
Tabilo A.[5]
Bangoura S.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[9]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Ofner S.[3]
6-36-726-3
Torpegaard M.[12]
Kovacevic A.
6-26-3
Wolf J.[6]
Rodionov J.
4-66-37-5
Kudla D.[1]
Quiroz R.
7-56-4
Korda S.[15]
Young D.
6-36-2
R64
Young D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-43-66-3
Clezar G.
Smith J.
6-32-67-63
Rodionov J.
Hopper J.
6-26-1
Cressy M.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Mansouri S.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bangoura S.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Aragone J.
Hidalgo D.
6-46-3
Nakashima B.
Redlicki M.
6-47-63
Harrison R.
Altamirano C.
6-47-65
Blancaneaux G.
Redlicki M.
4-66-36-0
Bellucci T.
Roelofse R.
7-646-3
Watanuki Y.
Vukic A.
6-37-5
Quiroz R.
Guinard M.
7-56-1
Kovacevic A.
King K.
3-66-46-2
Sarmiento R.
Brown A.
6-46-2
Blanch U.
Kirkov V.
6-26-3