Jordan Thompson vs John Isner — New York Round of 16

New York · ATP · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2020
hard
USA1
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Thompson J.
7-6 6-7 6-3
Isner J.
Thompson J.
776362
Isner J.
627731

Jordan Thompson defeated John Isner 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the New York round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's semi-final, but Jordan Thompson had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on hard. Jordan Thompson narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-14Cincinnati MastersR64hardJordan Thompson7-6(5) 7-6(2)
2019-08-05Canada MastersR64hardJohn Isner3-6 6-3 7-6(6)
2019-02-11New YorkQFhardJohn Isner6-4 6-1
2017-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayJohn Isner6-3 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Isner J.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Isner J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
28%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
21.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Isner J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
64
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Clear edge
24
0
Deciding sets·Even
91
91
Tiebreaks·Even
95
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[8]
Seppi A.
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Seppi A.
Jung J.
6-36-2
Edmund K.[8]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Seppi A.
Thompson J.
6-726-46-1
Jung J.
Opelka R.[3]
5-76-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Humbert U.[4]
3-66-26-4
Edmund K.[8]
Kwon S.
3-66-27-65
R16
Thompson J.
Isner J.[1]
7-626-736-3
Opelka R.[3]
Nishioka Y.
6-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Lorenzi P.
6-36-3
Humbert U.[4]
Giron M.
6-16-0
Kwon S.
Raonic M.[2]
7-646-746-4
Edmund K.[8]
Koepfer D.
6-26-4
Jung J.
Norrie C.[7]
6-46-4
Seppi A.
Johnson S.
7-646-3
R32
Seppi A.
Dzumhur D.
6-31-67-66
Nishioka Y.
Laaksonen H.
6-30-66-2
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Paul T.
6-46-2
Giron M.
Sock J.
6-36-4
Edmund K.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Koepfer D.
Schnur B.
6-46-3
Kwon S.
Soeda G.
6-26-726-3
Johnson S.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-756-37-63
Jung J.
Anderson K.
7-666-4
Norrie C.[7]
Shi B.
7-56-3
Lorenzi P.
Petrovic D.
4-66-46-0
Thompson J.
Karlovic I.
6-37-62