James Duckworth vs Thomas Fabbiano — Bengaluru CH Quarter-final

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
James Duckworth
AUS4
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2020
hard
ITA9
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Duckworth J.
6-7 6-0 6-2
Fabbiano T.
Duckworth J.
65662
Fabbiano T.
77021

James Duckworth defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-7 6-0 6-2 in the Bengaluru CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — James Duckworth came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. James Duckworth extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-30TokyoQ1hardJames Duckworth6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve advantage — Duckworth J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Duckworth J.Fabbiano T.
25
Serve
—
13
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
81
Break points won·Clear edge
4
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Fabbiano T.
Freshness·
91
—

Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[4]
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[2]
Rola B.[11]
6-44-66-2
Bonzi B.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-757-56-4
Duckworth J.[4]
Fabbiano T.[9]
6-756-06-2
Ocleppo J.
Ivashka I.[13]
7-646-736-4
R16
Fabbiano T.[9]
Myneni S.
6-45-76-2
Ocleppo J.
Rawat S.
7-56-4
Rola B.[11]
Nagal S.[8]
6-36-3
Travaglia S.[2]
Safwat M.[14]
6-27-65
Sugita Y.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-696-1
Ivashka I.[13]
Ramanathan R.[17]
7-626-1
Bonzi B.
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-656-0
R32
Ocleppo J.
Zhang Z.[10]
6-16-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Coppejans K.[15]
6-33-67-5
Myneni S.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-36-3
Fabbiano T.[9]
Lokoli L.
6-32-66-1
Duckworth J.[4]
Sultanov K.
6-47-65
Rawat S.
Reddy R.
6-26-2
Ivashka I.[13]
Mukund S.
7-56-3
Ramanathan R.[17]
Shanmugam A.
6-16-3
Safwat M.[14]
Ebden M.
7-656-717-5
Rola B.[11]
Orlov V.
7-56-3
Sugita Y.[3]
Safranek V.
6-46-3
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Rosol L.[16]
6-42-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Fanselow S.
6-24-66-4
Bonzi B.
Milojevic N.[12]
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[2]
Baldi F.
6-26-1
Nagal S.[8]
Jaziri M.
6-06-4
R64
Baldi F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Ebden M.
Yang T.
6-04-67-62
Jaziri M.
Kadhe A.
6-27-65
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Kalyanpur A.
6-46-757-64
Bonzi B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Myneni S.
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Lokoli L.
Pavlasek A.
6-37-64
Sultanov K.
Dev S.
6-26-1
Rawat S.
Gojo B.
3-67-637-63
Shanmugam A.
Masur D.
7-56-3
Safranek V.
Ornago F.
7-657-5
Fanselow S.
Bobrov B.
6-26-3
Ocleppo J.
Chandrasekar A.
6-26-1
Orlov V.
Prabodh S.
6-26-2
Mukund S.
Kavcic B.
2-66-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Maamoun K.
6-13-66-0