Guilherme Clezar vs John Patrick Smith — Cleveland CH Round of 64

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
BRA
Guilherme Clezar
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2020
hard
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Clezar G.
6-3 2-6 7-6
Smith J.
Clezar G.
62772
Smith J.
36631

Guilherme Clezar defeated John Patrick Smith 6-3 2-6 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — John Patrick Smith came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Guilherme Clezar claimed a first win over John Patrick Smith in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-08-31US OpenQ3hardJohn Patrick Smith6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Clezar G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Smith J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Clezar G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clezar G.Smith J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clezar G.Smith J.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
86
Break points won·Even
7
6
Deciding sets·Even
19
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Torpegaard M.[12]
Watanuki Y.
6-31-66-1
Semi-finals
Watanuki Y.
Escobedo E.[9]
6-46-4
Torpegaard M.[12]
Bellucci T.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Bellucci T.
Blancaneaux G.
4-66-36-4
Watanuki Y.
Blanch U.
7-57-5
Torpegaard M.[12]
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.[9]
Kudla D.[1]
6-747-666-4
R16
Torpegaard M.[12]
Mmoh M.[8]
7-634-67-60
Blancaneaux G.
Harrison R.
6-33-66-2
Blanch U.
Cressy M.
7-665-77-64
Watanuki Y.
Mansouri S.
6-46-3
Escobedo E.[9]
Tabilo A.[5]
6-46-3
Bellucci T.
Wolf J.[6]
6-36-4
Kudla D.[1]
Korda S.[15]
6-16-3
Sarmiento R.
Aragone J.
6-47-5
R32
Watanuki Y.
Rinderknech A.[13]
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[8]
Nakashima B.
7-626-2
Aragone J.
Oconnell C.[2]
7-656-2
Sarmiento R.
Nam J.[16]
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Kamke T.[14]
6-17-62
Bellucci T.
Cid R.[10]
6-26-4
Cressy M.
Menezes J.[7]
6-47-66
Blanch U.
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Popko D.[4]
6-36-4
Tabilo A.[5]
Bangoura S.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[9]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Harrison R.
Ofner S.[3]
6-36-726-3
Torpegaard M.[12]
Kovacevic A.
6-26-3
Wolf J.[6]
Rodionov J.
4-66-37-5
Kudla D.[1]
Quiroz R.
7-56-4
Korda S.[15]
Young D.
6-36-2
R64
Young D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-43-66-3
Clezar G.
Smith J.
6-32-67-63
Rodionov J.
Hopper J.
6-26-1
Cressy M.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Mansouri S.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bangoura S.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Aragone J.
Hidalgo D.
6-46-3
Nakashima B.
Redlicki M.
6-47-63
Harrison R.
Altamirano C.
6-47-65
Blancaneaux G.
Redlicki M.
4-66-36-0
Bellucci T.
Roelofse R.
7-646-3
Watanuki Y.
Vukic A.
6-37-5
Quiroz R.
Guinard M.
7-56-1
Kovacevic A.
King K.
3-66-46-2
Sarmiento R.
Brown A.
6-46-2
Blanch U.
Kirkov V.
6-26-3