Jaqueline Cristian vs Veronika KudermetovaFed Cup QLS R1: ROU vs RUS Round Robin

Fed Cup QLS R1: ROU vs RUS · WTA · Round Robin
#37WTA
1834ELO
1803Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Friday, 7 February 2020
hard
#115WTA
1836ELO
1786Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWW
Cristian J.
7-5 6-3
Kudermetova V.
Cristian J.
762
Kudermetova V.
530

Jaqueline Cristian defeated Veronika Kudermetova 7-5 6-3 in the Fed Cup QLS R1: ROU vs RUS round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Jaqueline Cristian came in ranked #37, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Jaqueline Cristian extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

20
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian WellsR128hardJaqueline Cristian6-2 6-3
2021-11-08LinzQFhardJaqueline Cristian6-3 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Cristian J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kudermetova V.

Kudermetova V.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Serve advantage — Kudermetova V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cristian J.Kudermetova V.
22
Serve
67
25
Return
24

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
56%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
77
85
Break points saved·Even
84
85
Break points won·Clear edge
71
85
Deciding sets·Even
91
91
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
88
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About