Brandon Nakashima vs Bernard Tomic — Dallas CH Round of 32

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2020
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS16
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Nakashima B.
6-2 6-3
Tomic B.
Nakashima B.
662
Tomic B.
230

Brandon Nakashima defeated Bernard Tomic 6-2 6-3 in the Dallas CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Tomic B.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Slight edge
13
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Tomic B.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
84

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Kudla D.[5]
7-57-610
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Koepfer D.[3]
7-676-2
Kudla D.[5]
Gomez E.[10]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Gomez E.[10]
Wolf J.[15]
7-687-66
Koepfer D.[3]
Mcdonald M.[8]
5-76-36-2
Rodionov J.
Menezes J.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[5]
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-47-66
R16
Tiafoe F.[1]
Nakashima B.
3-67-627-5
Menezes J.
Klahn B.[9]
3-67-667-65
Rodionov J.
Mmoh M.
6-746-26-1
Koepfer D.[3]
Istomin D.[13]
7-646-3
Mcdonald M.[8]
Ofner S.[11]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[10]
Jung J.[7]
4-66-47-66
Wolf J.[15]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-5
Kudla D.[5]
Krueger M.[12]
4-66-36-4
R32
Gomez E.[10]
Cressy M.
6-34-66-3
Watanuki Y.
Schnur B.[4]
6-26-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Vukic A.
4-67-676-4
Mmoh M.
Polansky P.[14]
6-36-2
Rodionov J.
Seppi A.[2]
6-36-4
Klahn B.[9]
Quiroz R.
7-666-4
Menezes J.
Oconnell C.[6]
3-66-47-67
Koepfer D.[3]
Bangoura S.
6-47-65
Istomin D.[13]
Tabilo A.
6-24-67-62
Ofner S.[11]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
Mcdonald M.[8]
Young D.
6-41-66-4
Jung J.[7]
King K.
7-646-4
Wolf J.[15]
Escobedo E.
7-676-3
Kudla D.[5]
Redlicki M.
6-27-62
Krueger M.[12]
Bellucci T.
6-776-47-69
Nakashima B.
Tomic B.[16]
6-26-3
R64
Redlicki M.
Novikov D.
6-46-3
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
7-627-67
Quiroz R.
Reese H.
7-637-5
Vukic A.
Rubin N.
7-56-2
Rodionov J.
Cid R.
7-656-3
Menezes J.
Chappell N.
6-766-36-1
Bangoura S.
Galan D.
5-76-36-2
Tabilo A.
Torpegaard M.
6-46-3
Blanch U.
Zhu E.
6-46-3
Young D.
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
King K.
Popko D.
7-56-3
Cressy M.
Uchida K.
7-656-4
Escobedo E.
Oliveira G.
6-26-3
Watanuki Y.
Korda S.
6-37-5
Bellucci T.
Eubanks C.
1-66-27-62
Nakashima B.
Harrison R.
6-36-4