Lorenzo Giustino vs Dane Sweeny — Launceston CH Round of 16

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA4
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1426Hard ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2020
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Giustino L.
6-2 6-3
Sweeny D.
Giustino L.
662
Sweeny D.
230

Lorenzo Giustino defeated Dane Sweeny 6-2 6-3 in the Launceston CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Giustino L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giustino L.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 183). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giustino L.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
2
45
Break points saved·Dominant
41
69
Break points won·Even
12
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Giustino L.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Dominant
51
98

Giustino L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Safwat M.[9]
Bolt A.[2]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Bolt A.[2]
Altmaier D.
6-16-4
Safwat M.[9]
Coppejans K.[6]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.
Gojo B.
7-56-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Giustino L.[4]
7-6105-76-4
Safwat M.[9]
Broady L.[13]
7-676-3
Bolt A.[2]
Caruana L.
7-606-3
R16
Bolt A.[2]
Lock B.
6-16-1
Caruana L.
Wu T.[11]
5-76-46-4
Altmaier D.
Franco Descotte M.
7-56-1
Gojo B.
Lee D.[12]
6-746-27-5
Giustino L.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-26-3
Safwat M.[9]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-4
Broady L.[13]
Mott B.
6-37-64
Coppejans K.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-27-5
R32
Lock B.
Lenz J.[14]
6-25-77-63
Wu T.[11]
Grills J.
4-66-47-64
Caruana L.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
6-16-2
Altmaier D.
Galovic V.[15]
6-46-3
Gojo B.
Diez S.
7-56-2
Bourchier H.
Purcell M.[10]
7-56-3
Pervolarakis M.
Clarke J.[5]
6-44-66-4
Safwat M.[9]
Kubler J.
7-616-0
Mott B.
Polmans M.[1]
6-36-4
Broady L.[13]
Tanuma R.
6-36-2
Coppejans K.[6]
Simon T.
6-46-746-3
Bolt A.[2]
Kelly D.
7-686-4
Giustino L.[4]
Kavcic B.
0-67-57-67
Sweeny D.
Santillan A.[16]
6-23-66-4
Lee D.[12]
Puttergill C.
6-46-1
Franco Descotte M.
Ito T.[3]
7-636-4
R64
Gojo B.
Song E.
6-06-777-5
Franco Descotte M.
Ionel N.
7-676-2
Bourchier H.
Peliwo F.
7-646-2
Sweeny D.
Vavassori A.
7-662-66-3
Kavcic B.
Noguchi R.
6-27-5
Mott B.
Tajima N.
4-66-16-2
Pervolarakis M.
Heliovaara H.
6-36-3
Lock B.
Banes M.
6-27-68
Grills J.
Romios M.
6-16-0
Tanuma R.
Schoolkate T.
6-26-3
Puttergill C.
King E.
7-656-3
Kubler J.
Fancutt T.
6-46-3
Caruana L.
Beale J.
6-06-1
Kelly D.
Ellis B.
6-27-63
Simon T.
Crnokrak A.
6-47-65
Altmaier D.
Klein B.
7-57-63