Daniel Altmaier vs Borna Gojo — Launceston CH Quarter-final

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Daniel Altmaier
GER
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1652Hard ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2020
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Altmaier D.
7-5 6-4
Gojo B.
Altmaier D.
762
Gojo B.
540

Daniel Altmaier defeated Borna Gojo 7-5 6-4 in the Launceston CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Altmaier came in ranked #60, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Daniel Altmaier extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-19HalleQ1grassDaniel Altmaier7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Altmaier D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Altmaier D.Gojo B.
16
Serve
—
4
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Altmaier D.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
10.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Altmaier D.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
53
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Clear edge
34
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Altmaier D.Gojo B.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Altmaier D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Safwat M.[9]
Bolt A.[2]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Bolt A.[2]
Altmaier D.
6-16-4
Safwat M.[9]
Coppejans K.[6]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.
Gojo B.
7-56-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Giustino L.[4]
7-6105-76-4
Safwat M.[9]
Broady L.[13]
7-676-3
Bolt A.[2]
Caruana L.
7-606-3
R16
Bolt A.[2]
Lock B.
6-16-1
Caruana L.
Wu T.[11]
5-76-46-4
Altmaier D.
Franco Descotte M.
7-56-1
Gojo B.
Lee D.[12]
6-746-27-5
Giustino L.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-26-3
Safwat M.[9]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-4
Broady L.[13]
Mott B.
6-37-64
Coppejans K.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-27-5
R32
Lock B.
Lenz J.[14]
6-25-77-63
Wu T.[11]
Grills J.
4-66-47-64
Caruana L.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
6-16-2
Altmaier D.
Galovic V.[15]
6-46-3
Gojo B.
Diez S.
7-56-2
Bourchier H.
Purcell M.[10]
7-56-3
Pervolarakis M.
Clarke J.[5]
6-44-66-4
Safwat M.[9]
Kubler J.
7-616-0
Mott B.
Polmans M.[1]
6-36-4
Broady L.[13]
Tanuma R.
6-36-2
Coppejans K.[6]
Simon T.
6-46-746-3
Bolt A.[2]
Kelly D.
7-686-4
Giustino L.[4]
Kavcic B.
0-67-57-67
Sweeny D.
Santillan A.[16]
6-23-66-4
Lee D.[12]
Puttergill C.
6-46-1
Franco Descotte M.
Ito T.[3]
7-636-4
R64
Gojo B.
Song E.
6-06-777-5
Franco Descotte M.
Ionel N.
7-676-2
Bourchier H.
Peliwo F.
7-646-2
Sweeny D.
Vavassori A.
7-662-66-3
Kavcic B.
Noguchi R.
6-27-5
Mott B.
Tajima N.
4-66-16-2
Pervolarakis M.
Heliovaara H.
6-36-3
Lock B.
Banes M.
6-27-68
Grills J.
Romios M.
6-16-0
Tanuma R.
Schoolkate T.
6-26-3
Puttergill C.
King E.
7-656-3
Kubler J.
Fancutt T.
6-46-3
Caruana L.
Beale J.
6-06-1
Kelly D.
Ellis B.
6-27-63
Simon T.
Crnokrak A.
6-47-65
Altmaier D.
Klein B.
7-57-63