Andrea Vavassori vs Dane Sweeny — Burnie CH Round of 64

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Andrea Vavassori
#563ATP
1688ELO
1655Hard ELO
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Vavassori A.
7-5 4-6 6-0
Sweeny D.
Vavassori A.
7462
Sweeny D.
5601

Andrea Vavassori defeated Dane Sweeny 7-5 4-6 6-0 in the Burnie CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vavassori A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Vavassori A.

Serve advantage — Vavassori A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vavassori A.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 183). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vavassori A.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
69
Break points won·Clear edge
33
11
Deciding sets·Slight edge
58
68
Tiebreaks·Even
82
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Vavassori A.Sweeny D.
Freshness·
—
98

Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[10]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Daniel T.[1]
Clarke J.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[6]
Bolt A.[4]
4-67-56-2
Daniel T.[1]
Safwat M.[11]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-1
Kubler J.
Li Z.[12]
7-664-66-2
R16
Pervolarakis M.
Maden Y.[2]
6-16-0
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Milojevic N.[7]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Kavcic B.
6-776-46-4
Li Z.[12]
Giustino L.[5]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-16-756-4
Bolt A.[4]
Lee D.[14]
6-36-2
Safwat M.[11]
Coppejans K.[8]
3-66-36-4
Daniel T.[1]
Wu T.[13]
6-46-4
R32
Safwat M.[11]
Gojo B.
3-67-56-3
Daniel T.[1]
Shimizu Y.
7-647-65
Li Z.[12]
Grills J.
6-16-0
Kavcic B.
Lenz J.[16]
6-46-4
Wu T.[13]
Song E.
6-06-3
Bolt A.[4]
Caruana L.
7-57-5
Maden Y.[2]
Noguchi R.
6-26-2
Pervolarakis M.
Broady L.[15]
6-03-67-61
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-3
Milojevic N.[7]
Lock B.
6-16-4
Kubler J.
Diez S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Giustino L.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-3
Clarke J.[6]
Klein B.
1-66-36-4
Altmaier D.
Harris A.[9]
6-36-4
Lee D.[14]
King E.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[8]
Bourchier H.
5-76-36-4
R64
Altmaier D.
Crnokrak A.
5-76-46-4
Pervolarakis M.
Simon T.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Kubler J.
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Vavassori A.
Sweeny D.
7-54-66-0
Bourchier H.
Banes M.
6-37-66
Grills J.
Kelly D.
6-26-746-4
Kavcic B.
Doumbia S.
6-27-5
Lock B.
Tsitsipas P.
4-66-26-2
Noguchi R.
Fancutt T.
6-47-64
Caruana L.
Niki T.
7-56-3
Klein B.
Romios M.
6-34-66-2
King E.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Gojo B.
Franco Descotte M.
6-16-3
Song E.
Peliwo F.
6-27-67
Shimizu Y.
Galovic V.
6-17-65