Cem Ilkel vs Maxime Janvier — Quimper CH Final

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
Maxime Janvier
FRA5
Maxime Janvier
#566ATP
1297ELO
1282Hard ELO
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Ilkel C.
7-6 7-5
Janvier M.
Ilkel C.
7872
Janvier M.
6650

Cem Ilkel defeated Maxime Janvier 7-6 7-5 in the Quimper CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maxime Janvier came in ranked #566, defending last year's round of 64. Cem Ilkel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardCem Ilkel6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Janvier M.

Janvier M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
5.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
71
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
Freshness·
—
83

Janvier M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.[5]
7-667-5
Semi-finals
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.[16]
6-45-76-4
Ilkel C.
Lacko L.[3]
6-36-777-65
Quarter-finals
Janvier M.[5]
Kolar Z.[14]
6-41-66-3
Ilkel C.
Kopriva V.
6-26-716-1
Lacko L.[3]
Zverev M.
6-736-26-4
Bourgue M.[16]
Bachinger M.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Bachinger M.[9]
Zapata Miralles B.[7]
6-47-5
Kopriva V.
Vatutin A.[6]
7-627-64
Ilkel C.
Lestienne C.[13]
4-67-56-3
Zverev M.
Halys Q.[11]
6-46-0
Lacko L.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.[15]
6-26-2
Bourgue M.[16]
Couacaud E.[4]
6-14-66-4
Janvier M.[5]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Kolar Z.[14]
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
6-46-3
R32
Halys Q.[11]
Janowicz J.
W/O
Ilkel C.
Petrovic D.[2]
7-663-1
Lestienne C.[13]
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.[6]
Jacquet K.
6-766-21-0
Kopriva V.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-47-66
Lacko L.[3]
Arnaboldi A.
7-6114-66-3
Couacaud E.[4]
Rinderknech A.
4-65-2
Zapata Miralles B.[7]
Serdarusic N.
7-646-3
Bourgue M.[16]
Machac T.
7-636-4
Janvier M.[5]
Klein L.
6-37-63
Masur D.
Moraing M.[12]
3-66-47-64
Kolar Z.[14]
Guinard M.
7-52-66-0
Bachinger M.[9]
Gabashvili T.
7-645-76-4
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
Kamke T.
1-66-36-4
Ortega Olmedo R.[15]
Vanni L.
7-646-1
Zverev M.
Moriya H.[8]
6-27-65
R64
Jacquet K.
Basic M.
7-643-66-3
Guinard M.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-63
Rinderknech A.
Escoffier A.
7-647-65
Gabashvili T.
Musetti L.
6-37-66
Celikbilek A.
Kotov P.
7-56-1
Ilkel C.
Durasovic V.
4-66-46-4
Machac T.
Ignatik U.
7-6106-2
Kopriva V.
Krstin P.
6-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Molcan A.
6-16-4
Vanni L.
Added D.
6-43-67-64
Janowicz J.
Furness E.
6-36-4
Zverev M.
Brancaccio R.
6-14-66-3
Serdarusic N.
Eriksson M.
6-16-766-4
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.
7-656-3
Masur D.
Miedler L.
6-43-66-3
Kamke T.
Royer V.
7-646-2