Tomas Machac vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Quimper CH Round of 64

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Machac T.
7-6 6-2
Ignatik U.
Machac T.
71262
Ignatik U.
61020

Tomas Machac defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 7-6 6-2 in the Quimper CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Ignatik U.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
53
Break points won·Dominant
80
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.[5]
7-667-5
Semi-finals
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.[16]
6-45-76-4
Ilkel C.
Lacko L.[3]
6-36-777-65
Quarter-finals
Janvier M.[5]
Kolar Z.[14]
6-41-66-3
Ilkel C.
Kopriva V.
6-26-716-1
Lacko L.[3]
Zverev M.
6-736-26-4
Bourgue M.[16]
Bachinger M.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Bachinger M.[9]
Zapata Miralles B.[7]
6-47-5
Kopriva V.
Vatutin A.[6]
7-627-64
Ilkel C.
Lestienne C.[13]
4-67-56-3
Zverev M.
Halys Q.[11]
6-46-0
Lacko L.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.[15]
6-26-2
Bourgue M.[16]
Couacaud E.[4]
6-14-66-4
Janvier M.[5]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Kolar Z.[14]
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
6-46-3
R32
Halys Q.[11]
Janowicz J.
W/O
Ilkel C.
Petrovic D.[2]
7-663-1
Lestienne C.[13]
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.[6]
Jacquet K.
6-766-21-0
Kopriva V.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-47-66
Lacko L.[3]
Arnaboldi A.
7-6114-66-3
Couacaud E.[4]
Rinderknech A.
4-65-2
Zapata Miralles B.[7]
Serdarusic N.
7-646-3
Bourgue M.[16]
Machac T.
7-636-4
Janvier M.[5]
Klein L.
6-37-63
Masur D.
Moraing M.[12]
3-66-47-64
Kolar Z.[14]
Guinard M.
7-52-66-0
Bachinger M.[9]
Gabashvili T.
7-645-76-4
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
Kamke T.
1-66-36-4
Ortega Olmedo R.[15]
Vanni L.
7-646-1
Zverev M.
Moriya H.[8]
6-27-65
R64
Jacquet K.
Basic M.
7-643-66-3
Guinard M.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-63
Rinderknech A.
Escoffier A.
7-647-65
Gabashvili T.
Musetti L.
6-37-66
Celikbilek A.
Kotov P.
7-56-1
Ilkel C.
Durasovic V.
4-66-46-4
Machac T.
Ignatik U.
7-6106-2
Kopriva V.
Krstin P.
6-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Molcan A.
6-16-4
Vanni L.
Added D.
6-43-67-64
Janowicz J.
Furness E.
6-36-4
Zverev M.
Brancaccio R.
6-14-66-3
Serdarusic N.
Eriksson M.
6-16-766-4
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.
7-656-3
Masur D.
Miedler L.
6-43-66-3
Kamke T.
Royer V.
7-646-2