Rio Noguchi vs Thomas Fancutt — Burnie CH Round of 64

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Rio Noguchi
JPN
Rio Noguchi
#222ATP
1532ELO
1513Hard ELO
27 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
Thomas Fancutt
AUS
Thomas Fancutt
#851ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Noguchi R.
6-4 7-6
Fancutt T.
Noguchi R.
6772
Fancutt T.
4640

Rio Noguchi defeated Thomas Fancutt 6-4 7-6 in the Burnie CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Noguchi R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Fancutt T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Noguchi R.

Serve advantage — Noguchi R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Noguchi R.Fancutt T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Noguchi R.Fancutt T.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
24
Break points saved·Dominant
25
62
Break points won·Slight edge
26
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
56
Tiebreaks·Even
4
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Noguchi R.Fancutt T.
Freshness·Slight edge
68
61

Noguchi R.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 60 games (7d) · Fancutt T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[10]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Daniel T.[1]
Clarke J.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[6]
Bolt A.[4]
4-67-56-2
Daniel T.[1]
Safwat M.[11]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-1
Kubler J.
Li Z.[12]
7-664-66-2
R16
Pervolarakis M.
Maden Y.[2]
6-16-0
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Milojevic N.[7]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Kavcic B.
6-776-46-4
Li Z.[12]
Giustino L.[5]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-16-756-4
Bolt A.[4]
Lee D.[14]
6-36-2
Safwat M.[11]
Coppejans K.[8]
3-66-36-4
Daniel T.[1]
Wu T.[13]
6-46-4
R32
Safwat M.[11]
Gojo B.
3-67-56-3
Daniel T.[1]
Shimizu Y.
7-647-65
Li Z.[12]
Grills J.
6-16-0
Kavcic B.
Lenz J.[16]
6-46-4
Wu T.[13]
Song E.
6-06-3
Bolt A.[4]
Caruana L.
7-57-5
Maden Y.[2]
Noguchi R.
6-26-2
Pervolarakis M.
Broady L.[15]
6-03-67-61
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-3
Milojevic N.[7]
Lock B.
6-16-4
Kubler J.
Diez S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Giustino L.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-3
Clarke J.[6]
Klein B.
1-66-36-4
Altmaier D.
Harris A.[9]
6-36-4
Lee D.[14]
King E.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[8]
Bourchier H.
5-76-36-4
R64
Altmaier D.
Crnokrak A.
5-76-46-4
Pervolarakis M.
Simon T.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Kubler J.
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Vavassori A.
Sweeny D.
7-54-66-0
Bourchier H.
Banes M.
6-37-66
Grills J.
Kelly D.
6-26-746-4
Kavcic B.
Doumbia S.
6-27-5
Lock B.
Tsitsipas P.
4-66-26-2
Noguchi R.
Fancutt T.
6-47-64
Caruana L.
Niki T.
7-56-3
Klein B.
Romios M.
6-34-66-2
King E.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Gojo B.
Franco Descotte M.
6-16-3
Song E.
Peliwo F.
6-27-67
Shimizu Y.
Galovic V.
6-17-65