Taro Daniel vs Yannick Hanfmann — Burnie CH Final

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Taro Daniel
JPN1
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
Yannick Hanfmann
GER10
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1721Hard ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLWL
Daniel T.
6-2 6-2
Hanfmann Y.
Daniel T.
662
Hanfmann Y.
220

Taro Daniel defeated Yannick Hanfmann 6-2 6-2 in the Burnie CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yannick Hanfmann came in ranked #51, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Taro Daniel claimed a first win over Yannick Hanfmann in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-07Rome MastersQ1clayYannick Hanfmann6-2 4-6 6-4
2021-04-26MunichR32clayYannick Hanfmann6-2 3-6 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Hanfmann Y.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Hanfmann Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Daniel T.Hanfmann Y.
—
Serve
58
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Hanfmann Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Hanfmann Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
61
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Slight edge
37
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Hanfmann Y.
Freshness·Dominant
59
93

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d) · Hanfmann Y.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[10]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Daniel T.[1]
Clarke J.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[6]
Bolt A.[4]
4-67-56-2
Daniel T.[1]
Safwat M.[11]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-1
Kubler J.
Li Z.[12]
7-664-66-2
R16
Pervolarakis M.
Maden Y.[2]
6-16-0
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Milojevic N.[7]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Kavcic B.
6-776-46-4
Li Z.[12]
Giustino L.[5]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-16-756-4
Bolt A.[4]
Lee D.[14]
6-36-2
Safwat M.[11]
Coppejans K.[8]
3-66-36-4
Daniel T.[1]
Wu T.[13]
6-46-4
R32
Safwat M.[11]
Gojo B.
3-67-56-3
Daniel T.[1]
Shimizu Y.
7-647-65
Li Z.[12]
Grills J.
6-16-0
Kavcic B.
Lenz J.[16]
6-46-4
Wu T.[13]
Song E.
6-06-3
Bolt A.[4]
Caruana L.
7-57-5
Maden Y.[2]
Noguchi R.
6-26-2
Pervolarakis M.
Broady L.[15]
6-03-67-61
Hanfmann Y.[10]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-3
Milojevic N.[7]
Lock B.
6-16-4
Kubler J.
Diez S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Giustino L.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-3
Clarke J.[6]
Klein B.
1-66-36-4
Altmaier D.
Harris A.[9]
6-36-4
Lee D.[14]
King E.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[8]
Bourchier H.
5-76-36-4
R64
Altmaier D.
Crnokrak A.
5-76-46-4
Pervolarakis M.
Simon T.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Kubler J.
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Vavassori A.
Sweeny D.
7-54-66-0
Bourchier H.
Banes M.
6-37-66
Grills J.
Kelly D.
6-26-746-4
Kavcic B.
Doumbia S.
6-27-5
Lock B.
Tsitsipas P.
4-66-26-2
Noguchi R.
Fancutt T.
6-47-64
Caruana L.
Niki T.
7-56-3
Klein B.
Romios M.
6-34-66-2
King E.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Gojo B.
Franco Descotte M.
6-16-3
Song E.
Peliwo F.
6-27-67
Shimizu Y.
Galovic V.
6-17-65