Martin Cuevas vs Carlos Taberner — Punta Del Este CH Round of 32

Punta Del Este CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
URU
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP11
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Cuevas M.
2-6 7-5 6-1
Taberner C.
Cuevas M.
2762
Taberner C.
6511

Martin Cuevas defeated Carlos Taberner 2-6 7-5 6-1 in the Punta Del Este CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Martin Cuevas came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas M.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas M.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas M.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
53
Break points saved·Dominant
35
74
Break points won·Dominant
22
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
71
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[2]
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-636-767-5
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Martin A.[3]
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Meligeni Alves F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-47-63
Cecchinato M.[1]
Giannessi A.[9]
6-37-5
Monteiro T.[2]
Clezar G.
6-46-1
Martin A.[3]
Bagnis F.[6]
6-16-3
R16
Clezar G.
Coria F.[5]
7-54-67-5
Martin A.[3]
Casanova H.
6-46-0
Cecchinato M.[1]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Monteiro T.[2]
Cerundolo F.[16]
7-56-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivieri G.
7-654-66-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Cuevas M.
6-37-5
Giannessi A.[9]
Sousa P.[7]
4-66-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Sakamoto P.
5-76-05-0
R32
Olivieri G.
Mena F.[14]
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
7-56-1
Monteiro T.[2]
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Taberner C.[11]
2-67-56-1
Sousa P.[7]
Cerundolo J.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Collarini A.[12]
7-667-63
Meligeni Alves F.
Mager G.[4]
4-66-37-65
Cerundolo F.[16]
Luz O.
6-36-3
Blancaneaux G.
Varillas J.[8]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Seyboth Wild T.[15]
6-41-66-1
Giannessi A.[9]
Etcheverry T.
5-77-56-4
Cecchinato M.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Bagnis F.[6]
Alvarez N.
7-663-66-1
Sakamoto P.
Domingues J.[10]
7-646-2
Martin A.[3]
Hidalgo D.
6-36-3
Coria F.[5]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-4
R64
Casanova H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
3-66-45-0
Etcheverry T.
Arguello F.
6-36-3
Clezar G.
Cachin P.
6-47-60
Gomez Herrera C.
Ficovich J.
6-37-5
Olivieri G.
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Blancaneaux G.
Rune H.
6-16-2
Alvarez N.
Matos R.
3-66-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Luz O.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Olivo R.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Galdos S.
6-26-4
Kestelboim M.
Gutierrez O.
6-43-67-5
Villanueva G.
Fumeaux J.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.
Santanna B.
7-646-4
Hidalgo D.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-1
Sakamoto P.
Troche E.
6-26-0