Alejandro Tabilo vs Roberto Cid — Newport Beach CH Round of 64

Newport Beach CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1750Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
hard
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Tabilo A.
7-6 6-2
Cid R.
Tabilo A.
7962
Cid R.
6720

Alejandro Tabilo defeated Roberto Cid 7-6 6-2 in the Newport Beach CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Cid came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabilo A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Serve advantage — Tabilo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tabilo A.Cid R.
51
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tabilo A.Cid R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabilo A.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
0
Break points saved·Dominant
97
15
Break points won·Dominant
59
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
56
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tabilo A.Cid R.
Freshness·
98
—

Tabilo A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwiatkowski T.
Galan D.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Galan D.
Krueger M.[13]
6-27-63
Kwiatkowski T.
Johnson S.[4]
3-67-646-1
Quarter-finals
Kwiatkowski T.
Istomin D.[15]
7-666-4
Galan D.
Eubanks C.
4-67-656-3
Johnson S.[4]
Klahn B.[10]
6-46-2
Krueger M.[13]
Sarmiento R.
6-36-756-3
R16
Istomin D.[15]
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Schnur B.[6]
3-66-36-2
Klahn B.[10]
Korda S.
5-76-36-4
Eubanks C.
Redlicki M.
3-66-16-4
Galan D.
Kecmanovic M.[3]
6-36-766-3
Sarmiento R.
Aragone J.
7-57-63
Krueger M.[13]
Fritz T.[1]
6-43-66-3
Johnson S.[4]
Vukic A.
7-666-747-64
R32
Tiafoe F.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Gomez E.[11]
7-56-3
Kecmanovic M.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-14-66-3
Sarmiento R.
Mcdonald M.[9]
7-56-4
Fritz T.[1]
Velotti A.
6-36-3
Johnson S.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-2
Vukic A.
Polansky P.[16]
6-757-666-4
Klahn B.[10]
Escobedo E.
7-56-1
Aragone J.
Seppi A.[5]
6-27-62
Schnur B.[6]
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Jung J.[8]
6-47-5
Galan D.
Molleker R.[14]
6-36-1
Istomin D.[15]
Bangoura S.
7-666-4
Korda S.
Giron M.[7]
6-43-67-65
Redlicki M.
Copil M.[12]
7-636-4
Krueger M.[13]
Young D.
3-66-16-4
R64
Watanuki Y.
Mansouri S.
6-36-1
Tabilo A.
Cid R.
7-676-2
Bangoura S.
Popko D.
7-634-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Altamirano C.
6-16-3
Escobedo E.
Bellucci T.
6-17-5
Redlicki M.
Harrison R.
7-56-2
Aragone J.
Uchida K.
6-16-3
Sarmiento R.
King K.
6-47-5
Velotti A.
Nanda G.
6-46-0
Quiroz R.
Escobar G.
5-1
Vukic A.
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Young D.
Nakashima B.
1-67-656-4
Cressy M.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Ehrat S.
6-34-66-2
Galan D.
Ward J.
6-43-66-2
Eubanks C.
Sarkissian A.
6-47-5