Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Facundo Arguello — Punta Del Este CH Round of 64

Punta Del Este CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
ARG
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
#30ATP
1812ELO
1767Clay ELO
$1.4MYTD
$6.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2020
clay
ARG
Facundo Arguello
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWW
Etcheverry T.
6-3 6-3
Arguello F.
Etcheverry T.
662
Arguello F.
330

Tomas Martin Etcheverry defeated Facundo Arguello 6-3 6-3 in the Punta Del Este CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Arguello came in defending last year's final, but Tomas Martin Etcheverry had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 7 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Etcheverry T.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Arguello F.

Arguello F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Etcheverry T.

Serve advantage — Etcheverry T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Serve & return on clay

Etcheverry T.Arguello F.
56
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Etcheverry T.Arguello F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
44%
Service points won·Clear edge
65%
53%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
11.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Etcheverry T.Arguello F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
6
Break points saved·Dominant
98
34
Break points won·Clear edge
36
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Etcheverry T.Arguello F.
Freshness·
96
—

Etcheverry T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[2]
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-636-767-5
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Martin A.[3]
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Meligeni Alves F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-47-63
Cecchinato M.[1]
Giannessi A.[9]
6-37-5
Monteiro T.[2]
Clezar G.
6-46-1
Martin A.[3]
Bagnis F.[6]
6-16-3
R16
Clezar G.
Coria F.[5]
7-54-67-5
Martin A.[3]
Casanova H.
6-46-0
Cecchinato M.[1]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Monteiro T.[2]
Cerundolo F.[16]
7-56-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivieri G.
7-654-66-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Cuevas M.
6-37-5
Giannessi A.[9]
Sousa P.[7]
4-66-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Sakamoto P.
5-76-05-0
R32
Olivieri G.
Mena F.[14]
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
7-56-1
Monteiro T.[2]
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Taberner C.[11]
2-67-56-1
Sousa P.[7]
Cerundolo J.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Collarini A.[12]
7-667-63
Meligeni Alves F.
Mager G.[4]
4-66-37-65
Cerundolo F.[16]
Luz O.
6-36-3
Blancaneaux G.
Varillas J.[8]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Seyboth Wild T.[15]
6-41-66-1
Giannessi A.[9]
Etcheverry T.
5-77-56-4
Cecchinato M.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Bagnis F.[6]
Alvarez N.
7-663-66-1
Sakamoto P.
Domingues J.[10]
7-646-2
Martin A.[3]
Hidalgo D.
6-36-3
Coria F.[5]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-4
R64
Casanova H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
3-66-45-0
Etcheverry T.
Arguello F.
6-36-3
Clezar G.
Cachin P.
6-47-60
Gomez Herrera C.
Ficovich J.
6-37-5
Olivieri G.
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Blancaneaux G.
Rune H.
6-16-2
Alvarez N.
Matos R.
3-66-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Luz O.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Olivo R.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Galdos S.
6-26-4
Kestelboim M.
Gutierrez O.
6-43-67-5
Villanueva G.
Fumeaux J.
6-26-0
Cuevas M.
Santanna B.
7-646-4
Hidalgo D.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-1
Sakamoto P.
Troche E.
6-26-0