John Isner vs Tennys Sandgren — Auckland Round of 16

Auckland · ATP · Round of 16
USA4
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2020
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Isner J.
7-6 6-7 6-3
Sandgren T.
Isner J.
776162
Sandgren T.
637731

John Isner defeated Tennys Sandgren 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Auckland round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: John Isner closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-15StockholmQFhardJohn Isner7-6(8) 6-7(5) 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.1
8.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (118 vs 176). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Even
0
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Humbert U.
Paire B.[5]
7-623-67-65
Semi-finals
Paire B.[5]
Hurkacz H.[6]
6-46-716-2
Humbert U.
Isner J.[4]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[6]
Lopez F.
6-46-7116-4
Paire B.[5]
Millman J.
3-66-16-4
Humbert U.
Shapovalov D.[2]
7-56-4
Isner J.[4]
Edmund K.
7-657-65
R16
Lopez F.
Fognini F.[1]
3-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.[6]
Ymer M.
6-27-62
Millman J.
Khachanov K.[3]
4-66-36-3
Paire B.[5]
Monteiro T.
4-66-46-3
Isner J.[4]
Sandgren T.
7-636-716-3
Humbert U.
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Shapovalov D.[2]
Pospisil V.
6-47-62
Edmund K.
Seppi A.
6-37-64
R32
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.
6-45-76-1
Hurkacz H.[6]
Sonego L.
7-56-3
Millman J.
Mmoh M.
7-656-4
Monteiro T.
Norrie C.
7-636-2
Paire B.[5]
Sinner J.
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.
Mannarino A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Edmund K.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-24-66-3
Sandgren T.
Venus M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.
Ruud C.
7-632-66-3
Pospisil V.
Sousa J.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.
Mayer L.
7-666-7187-62
Lopez F.
Andujar P.
3-67-646-4