Kyle Edmund vs Andreas Seppi — Auckland Round of 16

Auckland · ATP · Round of 16
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2020
hard
ITA
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Edmund K.
6-3 7-6
Seppi A.
Edmund K.
6772
Seppi A.
3640

Kyle Edmund defeated Andreas Seppi 6-3 7-6 in the Auckland round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kyle Edmund came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Kyle Edmund extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Kyle Edmund closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-10New YorkFhardKyle Edmund7-5 6-1
2018-10-08Shanghai MastersR32hardKyle Edmund6-3 6-4
2018-04-16Monte Carlo MastersR64clayAndreas Seppi6-3 5-7 6-2
2018-01-15Australian OpenR16hardKyle Edmund6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 6-3
2016-10-17AntwerpQFhardKyle Edmund6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Seppi A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve advantage — Edmund K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Seppi A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Seppi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
53
Break points saved·Even
92
94
Break points won·Clear edge
22
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
63
Tiebreaks·Even
36
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Humbert U.
Paire B.[5]
7-623-67-65
Semi-finals
Paire B.[5]
Hurkacz H.[6]
6-46-716-2
Humbert U.
Isner J.[4]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[6]
Lopez F.
6-46-7116-4
Paire B.[5]
Millman J.
3-66-16-4
Humbert U.
Shapovalov D.[2]
7-56-4
Isner J.[4]
Edmund K.
7-657-65
R16
Lopez F.
Fognini F.[1]
3-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.[6]
Ymer M.
6-27-62
Millman J.
Khachanov K.[3]
4-66-36-3
Paire B.[5]
Monteiro T.
4-66-46-3
Isner J.[4]
Sandgren T.
7-636-716-3
Humbert U.
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Shapovalov D.[2]
Pospisil V.
6-47-62
Edmund K.
Seppi A.
6-37-64
R32
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.
6-45-76-1
Hurkacz H.[6]
Sonego L.
7-56-3
Millman J.
Mmoh M.
7-656-4
Monteiro T.
Norrie C.
7-636-2
Paire B.[5]
Sinner J.
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.
Mannarino A.[7]
3-66-46-4
Edmund K.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-24-66-3
Sandgren T.
Venus M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.
Ruud C.
7-632-66-3
Pospisil V.
Sousa J.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.
Mayer L.
7-666-7187-62
Lopez F.
Andujar P.
3-67-646-4