Emil Ruusuvuori vs Jannik Sinner — Bendigo CH Round of 32

Bendigo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
Jannik Sinner
ITA3
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2263Hard ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLWW
Ruusuvuori E.
6-3 6-4
Sinner J.
Ruusuvuori E.
662
Sinner J.
340

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Jannik Sinner 6-3 6-4 in the Bendigo CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1, leading the head-to-head 5–1. Emil Ruusuvuori narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-12s HertogenboschQFgrassEmil Ruusuvuori6-3 6-4
2023-03-20Miami MastersQFhardJannik Sinner6-3 6-1
2022-04-11Monte Carlo MastersR32clayJannik Sinner7-5 6-3
2022-03-21Miami MastersR64hardJannik Sinner6-4 3-6 7-6(8)
2021-08-02WashingtonR32hardJannik Sinner6-2 6-4
2021-03-22Miami MastersR16hardJannik Sinner6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Sinner J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruusuvuori E.Sinner J.
—
Serve
100
—
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Sinner J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
58%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
61%
74%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
7.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Sinner J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
100
Break points saved·Even
97
100
Break points won·Dominant
48
100
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
100
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Sinner J.
Freshness·
—
51

Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 109 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-654-66-3
Johnson S.[4]
Travaglia S.[3]
7-627-63
Semi-finals
Ruusuvuori E.
Kudla D.[15]
6-07-5
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Donskoy E.[14]
4-66-26-3
Johnson S.[4]
Vavassori A.
6-36-1
Travaglia S.[3]
Giron M.[7]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Donskoy E.[14]
Kwon S.[7]
7-664-66-1
Kudla D.[15]
Munar J.[6]
7-636-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Koepfer D.[8]
6-36-4
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Johnson S.[5]
7-647-5
Giron M.[7]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-46-2
Travaglia S.[3]
Oconnell C.[8]
6-46-2
Vavassori A.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[4]
Mayot H.
6-37-62
R16
Donskoy E.[14]
Li Z.
7-626-2
Koepfer D.[8]
Bolt A.
3-66-37-5
Munar J.[6]
Laaksonen H.[10]
6-36-3
Kudla D.[15]
Humbert U.[1]
7-646-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Daniel T.[13]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[5]
Klahn B.
6-47-64
Kwon S.[7]
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Gojowczyk P.[16]
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[8]
Crnokrak A.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[13]
5-76-36-2
Giron M.[7]
Mukund S.[11]
6-46-3
Travaglia S.[3]
Kravchuk K.[14]
7-676-3
Mayot H.
Grenier H.[12]
7-667-5
Vavassori A.
Banes M.[16]
6-756-36-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Watanuki Y.[10]
6-43-66-3
Johnson S.[4]
Puttergill C.
7-646-0
R32
Li Z.
Seppi A.[2]
3-67-56-4
Donskoy E.[14]
Harris A.
6-37-64
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Vukic A.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.[16]
Galan D.
3-67-56-3
Klahn B.
Gombos N.[12]
6-36-4
Johnson S.[5]
Zhang Z.
6-796-46-4
Koepfer D.[8]
Rola B.
6-43-66-0
Munar J.[6]
King D.
4-66-36-0
Laaksonen H.[10]
Otte O.
3-66-46-4
Kudla D.[15]
Krueger M.
6-746-26-4
Humbert U.[1]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Daniel T.[13]
Gunneswaran P.
6-47-64
Ruusuvuori E.
Sinner J.[3]
6-36-4
Bolt A.
Schnur B.[11]
6-26-3
Bourchier H.
Giron M.[9]
6-36-736-3
Kwon S.[7]
Maden Y.
6-16-2
Watanuki Y.[10]
Shimabukuro S.
7-656-3
Barrios Vera T.[13]
Nys H.
6-26-2
Giron M.[7]
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-0
Kravchuk K.[14]
Franco Descotte M.
6-26-4
Crnokrak A.
Gaston H.[9]
6-47-62
Mayot H.
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-56-4
Grenier H.[12]
Sun F.
7-56-1
Banes M.[16]
Tajima N.
6-16-2
Mukund S.[11]
Nishioka Y.
5-2
Vavassori A.
Fucsovics M.[1]
5-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Sweeny D.
7-666-3
Travaglia S.[3]
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Puttergill C.
Arevalo M.[15]
6-46-2
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Corbett J.
6-06-4
Oconnell C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-36-1
Johnson S.[4]
Kalovelonis M.
6-36-786-3
R64
Bolt A.
Horansky F.
6-26-1
Galan D.
Sela D.
5-76-26-4
Li Z.
Santillan A.
6-46-0
Bourchier H.
Polmans M.
5-76-37-64
Vukic A.
Gomez E.
7-57-64
Klahn B.
Varillas J.
7-56-3
Zhang Z.
Purcell M.
6-26-4
Rola B.
Ivashka I.
7-57-63
Ruusuvuori E.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-26-3
Otte O.
Giustino L.
5-76-16-4
Krueger M.
Ebden M.
6-26-4
Petrovic D.
Ymer E.
7-57-63
Harris A.
Copil M.
4-67-57-67
Gunneswaran P.
Kubler J.
7-56-3
King D.
Jung J.
4-66-46-3
Maden Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
7-626-3
Nys H.
Delaney J.
6-46-3
Franco Descotte M.
Grills J.
6-42-66-4
Crnokrak A.
Matsui T.
6-26-0
Puttergill C.
Court J.
6-27-64
Kalovelonis M.
Ionel N.
6-43-66-2
Tajima N.
Song M.
6-36-4
Kelly D.
Klein B.
6-37-5
Vavassori A.
Vanshelboim E.
6-46-4
Pervolarakis M.
Granollers G.
7-636-3
Nishioka Y.
Sinclair C.
6-26-4
Sun F.
Addison A.
7-667-5
Sweeny D.
Adamson A.
6-756-46-2
Caruana L.
Shyla Y.
1-66-46-1
Mayot H.
Zuk K.
6-47-5
Shimabukuro S.
Verbeek S.
6-776-46-4
Corbett J.
Delaney J.
6-46-1