Lucas Gerch vs Zachary Svajda — Ann Arbor CH Round of 64

Ann Arbor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
GER
Lucas Gerch
#941ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Gerch L.
6-3 6-3
Svajda Z.
Gerch L.
662
Svajda Z.
330

Lucas Gerch defeated Zachary Svajda 6-3 6-3 in the Ann Arbor CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gerch L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Svajda Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gerch L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gerch L.Svajda Z.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
12

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gerch L.Svajda Z.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerch L.Svajda Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
69
Break points saved·Dominant
27
89
Break points won·Dominant
11
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gerch L.Svajda Z.
Freshness·
—
86

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blanch U.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Blanch U.
Altmaier D.[10]
6-36-4
Cid R.[4]
Kozlov S.
7-615-76-3
Quarter-finals
Cid R.[4]
Quiroz R.[7]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-646-2
Blanch U.
Aragone J.[8]
7-55-76-2
Altmaier D.[10]
Leshem E.
7-647-5
R16
Aragone J.[8]
Gerch L.
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[10]
Kovacevic A.
5-77-646-3
Cid R.[4]
Bangoura S.[15]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[1]
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Leshem E.
Sakamoto P.[13]
4-66-37-5
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
4-66-36-2
Quiroz R.[7]
Serdarusic N.[9]
7-57-65
Blanch U.
Kypson P.
7-626-2
R32
Kypson P.
Redlicki M.[14]
3-66-26-3
Gerch L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-627-5
Aragone J.[8]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Leshem E.
Korda S.[3]
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.[13]
Zakharov A.
6-27-67
Altmaier D.[10]
Avidzba A.
6-46-766-3
Kovacevic A.
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Olivo R.[6]
7-626-2
Mcnally J.
Bellucci T.[16]
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.[9]
Hemery C.
3-1
Quiroz R.[7]
Simon T.
6-46-787-64
Fratangelo B.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
King K.[12]
6-37-62
Bangoura S.[15]
Redlicki M.
7-686-3
Cid R.[4]
Velotti A.
6-746-27-613
Blanch U.
Rubin N.[2]
7-57-64
R64
Fenty A.
Styler O.
7-647-65
Elias G.
Hidalgo D.
2-67-56-3
Kypson P.
Cerundolo J.
7-645-77-5
Zakharov A.
Lock B.
6-37-5
Simon T.
King E.
6-46-2
Velotti A.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Leshem E.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-4
Gerch L.
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Glasspool L.
6-46-1
Hemery C.
Bega A.
6-16-4
Avidzba A.
Song E.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-66
Kovacevic A.
Chappell N.
7-646-2
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-747-64
Nakashima B.
Roumane R.
6-26-2