Roberto Cid vs Stefan Kozlov — Ann Arbor CH Semi-final

Ann Arbor CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
DOM4
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Cid R.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Kozlov S.
Cid R.
77562
Kozlov S.
61731

Roberto Cid defeated Stefan Kozlov 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Ann Arbor CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Roberto Cid closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cid R.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cid R.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cid R.Kozlov S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
36
Break points saved·Dominant
15
49
Break points won·Slight edge
26
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cid R.Kozlov S.
Freshness·
—
69

Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blanch U.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Blanch U.
Altmaier D.[10]
6-36-4
Cid R.[4]
Kozlov S.
7-615-76-3
Quarter-finals
Cid R.[4]
Quiroz R.[7]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-646-2
Blanch U.
Aragone J.[8]
7-55-76-2
Altmaier D.[10]
Leshem E.
7-647-5
R16
Aragone J.[8]
Gerch L.
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[10]
Kovacevic A.
5-77-646-3
Cid R.[4]
Bangoura S.[15]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[1]
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Leshem E.
Sakamoto P.[13]
4-66-37-5
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
4-66-36-2
Quiroz R.[7]
Serdarusic N.[9]
7-57-65
Blanch U.
Kypson P.
7-626-2
R32
Kypson P.
Redlicki M.[14]
3-66-26-3
Gerch L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-627-5
Aragone J.[8]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Leshem E.
Korda S.[3]
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.[13]
Zakharov A.
6-27-67
Altmaier D.[10]
Avidzba A.
6-46-766-3
Kovacevic A.
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Olivo R.[6]
7-626-2
Mcnally J.
Bellucci T.[16]
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.[9]
Hemery C.
3-1
Quiroz R.[7]
Simon T.
6-46-787-64
Fratangelo B.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
King K.[12]
6-37-62
Bangoura S.[15]
Redlicki M.
7-686-3
Cid R.[4]
Velotti A.
6-746-27-613
Blanch U.
Rubin N.[2]
7-57-64
R64
Fenty A.
Styler O.
7-647-65
Elias G.
Hidalgo D.
2-67-56-3
Kypson P.
Cerundolo J.
7-645-77-5
Zakharov A.
Lock B.
6-37-5
Simon T.
King E.
6-46-2
Velotti A.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Leshem E.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-4
Gerch L.
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Glasspool L.
6-46-1
Hemery C.
Bega A.
6-16-4
Avidzba A.
Song E.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-66
Kovacevic A.
Chappell N.
7-646-2
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-747-64
Nakashima B.
Roumane R.
6-26-2