Patrick Kypson vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo — Ann Arbor CH Round of 64

Ann Arbor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1658Hard ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWWWW
Kypson P.
7-6 5-7 7-5
Cerundolo J.
Kypson P.
77572
Cerundolo J.
64751

Patrick Kypson defeated Juan Manuel Cerundolo 7-6 5-7 7-5 in the Ann Arbor CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #45.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Cerundolo J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Cerundolo J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Cerundolo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
85
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
82
Break points won·Dominant
41
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Cerundolo J.
Freshness·Slight edge
94
100

Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blanch U.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Blanch U.
Altmaier D.[10]
6-36-4
Cid R.[4]
Kozlov S.
7-615-76-3
Quarter-finals
Cid R.[4]
Quiroz R.[7]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-646-2
Blanch U.
Aragone J.[8]
7-55-76-2
Altmaier D.[10]
Leshem E.
7-647-5
R16
Aragone J.[8]
Gerch L.
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[10]
Kovacevic A.
5-77-646-3
Cid R.[4]
Bangoura S.[15]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[1]
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Leshem E.
Sakamoto P.[13]
4-66-37-5
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
4-66-36-2
Quiroz R.[7]
Serdarusic N.[9]
7-57-65
Blanch U.
Kypson P.
7-626-2
R32
Kypson P.
Redlicki M.[14]
3-66-26-3
Gerch L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-627-5
Aragone J.[8]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Leshem E.
Korda S.[3]
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.[13]
Zakharov A.
6-27-67
Altmaier D.[10]
Avidzba A.
6-46-766-3
Kovacevic A.
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Olivo R.[6]
7-626-2
Mcnally J.
Bellucci T.[16]
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.[9]
Hemery C.
3-1
Quiroz R.[7]
Simon T.
6-46-787-64
Fratangelo B.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
King K.[12]
6-37-62
Bangoura S.[15]
Redlicki M.
7-686-3
Cid R.[4]
Velotti A.
6-746-27-613
Blanch U.
Rubin N.[2]
7-57-64
R64
Fenty A.
Styler O.
7-647-65
Elias G.
Hidalgo D.
2-67-56-3
Kypson P.
Cerundolo J.
7-645-77-5
Zakharov A.
Lock B.
6-37-5
Simon T.
King E.
6-46-2
Velotti A.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Leshem E.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-4
Gerch L.
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Glasspool L.
6-46-1
Hemery C.
Bega A.
6-16-4
Avidzba A.
Song E.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-66
Kovacevic A.
Chappell N.
7-646-2
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-747-64
Nakashima B.
Roumane R.
6-26-2