Ulises Blanch vs Patrick Kypson — Ann Arbor CH Round of 16

Ann Arbor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Blanch U.
7-6 6-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
7762
Kypson P.
6220

Ulises Blanch defeated Patrick Kypson 7-6 6-2 in the Ann Arbor CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Even
6.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
93
Break points won·Dominant
2
41
Deciding sets·Even
19
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Blanch U.Kypson P.
Freshness·
—
94

Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blanch U.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Blanch U.
Altmaier D.[10]
6-36-4
Cid R.[4]
Kozlov S.
7-615-76-3
Quarter-finals
Cid R.[4]
Quiroz R.[7]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-646-2
Blanch U.
Aragone J.[8]
7-55-76-2
Altmaier D.[10]
Leshem E.
7-647-5
R16
Aragone J.[8]
Gerch L.
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[10]
Kovacevic A.
5-77-646-3
Cid R.[4]
Bangoura S.[15]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[1]
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Leshem E.
Sakamoto P.[13]
4-66-37-5
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
4-66-36-2
Quiroz R.[7]
Serdarusic N.[9]
7-57-65
Blanch U.
Kypson P.
7-626-2
R32
Kypson P.
Redlicki M.[14]
3-66-26-3
Gerch L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-627-5
Aragone J.[8]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Leshem E.
Korda S.[3]
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.[13]
Zakharov A.
6-27-67
Altmaier D.[10]
Avidzba A.
6-46-766-3
Kovacevic A.
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Olivo R.[6]
7-626-2
Mcnally J.
Bellucci T.[16]
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.[9]
Hemery C.
3-1
Quiroz R.[7]
Simon T.
6-46-787-64
Fratangelo B.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
King K.[12]
6-37-62
Bangoura S.[15]
Redlicki M.
7-686-3
Cid R.[4]
Velotti A.
6-746-27-613
Blanch U.
Rubin N.[2]
7-57-64
R64
Fenty A.
Styler O.
7-647-65
Elias G.
Hidalgo D.
2-67-56-3
Kypson P.
Cerundolo J.
7-645-77-5
Zakharov A.
Lock B.
6-37-5
Simon T.
King E.
6-46-2
Velotti A.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Leshem E.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-4
Gerch L.
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Glasspool L.
6-46-1
Hemery C.
Bega A.
6-16-4
Avidzba A.
Song E.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-66
Kovacevic A.
Chappell N.
7-646-2
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-747-64
Nakashima B.
Roumane R.
6-26-2