Daniel Altmaier vs Edan Leshem — Ann Arbor CH Quarter-final

Ann Arbor CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Daniel Altmaier
GER10
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1652Hard ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2020
hard
ISR
Edan Leshem
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Altmaier D.
7-6 7-5
Leshem E.
Altmaier D.
7772
Leshem E.
6450

Daniel Altmaier defeated Edan Leshem 7-6 7-5 in the Ann Arbor CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Altmaier D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Leshem E.

Leshem E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Altmaier D.Leshem E.
16
Serve
—
4
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Altmaier D.Leshem E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Altmaier D.Leshem E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
1
Break points saved·Dominant
96
47
Break points won·Dominant
34
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Altmaier D.Leshem E.
Freshness·
96
—

Altmaier D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blanch U.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Blanch U.
Altmaier D.[10]
6-36-4
Cid R.[4]
Kozlov S.
7-615-76-3
Quarter-finals
Cid R.[4]
Quiroz R.[7]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-646-2
Blanch U.
Aragone J.[8]
7-55-76-2
Altmaier D.[10]
Leshem E.
7-647-5
R16
Aragone J.[8]
Gerch L.
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[10]
Kovacevic A.
5-77-646-3
Cid R.[4]
Bangoura S.[15]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[1]
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Leshem E.
Sakamoto P.[13]
4-66-37-5
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
4-66-36-2
Quiroz R.[7]
Serdarusic N.[9]
7-57-65
Blanch U.
Kypson P.
7-626-2
R32
Kypson P.
Redlicki M.[14]
3-66-26-3
Gerch L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-627-5
Aragone J.[8]
Fenty A.
6-16-4
Leshem E.
Korda S.[3]
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.[13]
Zakharov A.
6-27-67
Altmaier D.[10]
Avidzba A.
6-46-766-3
Kovacevic A.
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Olivo R.[6]
7-626-2
Mcnally J.
Bellucci T.[16]
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.[9]
Hemery C.
3-1
Quiroz R.[7]
Simon T.
6-46-787-64
Fratangelo B.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
King K.[12]
6-37-62
Bangoura S.[15]
Redlicki M.
7-686-3
Cid R.[4]
Velotti A.
6-746-27-613
Blanch U.
Rubin N.[2]
7-57-64
R64
Fenty A.
Styler O.
7-647-65
Elias G.
Hidalgo D.
2-67-56-3
Kypson P.
Cerundolo J.
7-645-77-5
Zakharov A.
Lock B.
6-37-5
Simon T.
King E.
6-46-2
Velotti A.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Leshem E.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-4
Gerch L.
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Glasspool L.
6-46-1
Hemery C.
Bega A.
6-16-4
Avidzba A.
Song E.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Kirchheimer S.
6-37-66
Kovacevic A.
Chappell N.
7-646-2
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-747-64
Nakashima B.
Roumane R.
6-26-2