Fabio Fognini vs Reilly OpelkaDavis Cup Finals RR: USA vs ITA Round Robin

Davis Cup Finals RR: USA vs ITA · ATP · Round Robin
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 20 November 2019
hard
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Fognini F.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Opelka R.
Fognini F.
66462
Opelka R.
47731

Fabio Fognini defeated Reilly Opelka 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Davis Cup Finals RR: USA vs ITA round robin on hard. Fabio Fognini extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Fabio Fognini closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

11
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenR128hardFabio Fognini3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 7-6(5)
2019-08-26US OpenR128hardReilly Opelka6-3 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Fognini F.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Opelka R.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Fognini F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fognini F.Opelka R.
Serve
86
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
28%
Break points saved·Clear edge
58%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
17.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
87
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
100
Break points won·Dominant
81
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
93
88
Tiebreaks·Even
92
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About