Mikael Torpegaard vs Zachary Svajda — Champaign-Urbana CH Round of 32

Champaign-Urbana CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DEN4
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Torpegaard M.
6-1 6-2
Svajda Z.
Torpegaard M.
662
Svajda Z.
120

Mikael Torpegaard defeated Zachary Svajda 6-1 6-2 in the Champaign-Urbana CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Torpegaard M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Svajda Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Torpegaard M.Svajda Z.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
12

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Torpegaard M.Svajda Z.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Torpegaard M.Svajda Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
69
Break points saved·Dominant
35
89
Break points won·Dominant
13
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Torpegaard M.Svajda Z.
Freshness·
—
86

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.[9]
Korda S.[14]
6-46-737-66
Semi-finals
Korda S.[14]
Brown A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.[9]
Kavcic B.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.[9]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Kavcic B.
Smith K.
7-636-3
Brown A.
Ficovich J.[8]
7-56-3
Korda S.[14]
Redlicki M.
6-24-67-64
R16
Korda S.[14]
Gomez E.[3]
4-66-46-3
Brown A.
Aragone J.[13]
7-656-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Cid R.[10]
6-47-66
Redlicki M.
Corwin F.
6-47-5
Smith K.
Torpegaard M.[4]
6-06-3
Wolf J.[9]
Eubanks C.[6]
7-54-66-4
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-44-66-1
Kavcic B.
Glasspool L.
7-57-65
R32
Cid R.[10]
Roelofse R.
5-76-36-3
Redlicki M.
Polansky P.[5]
4-66-16-4
Korda S.[14]
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Smith K.
Smith R.[16]
3-66-37-63
Brown A.
Rola B.[2]
6-766-36-4
Aragone J.[13]
Sels J.
6-23-66-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-1
Gomez E.[3]
Gerch L.
6-46-756-2
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.[12]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Cerundolo F.[7]
6-26-0
Glasspool L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-57-65
Torpegaard M.[4]
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
Eubanks C.[6]
Nakashima B.
6-47-65
Wolf J.[9]
Altmaier D.
6-27-63
Song E.
King K.[15]
6-47-63
Kozlov S.
Kudla D.[1]
6-36-3
R64
Smith K.
Pena Lopez M.
6-26-1
Sels J.
Avidzba A.
6-36-1
Svajda Z.
Hardt N.
6-06-1
Glasspool L.
Geerts M.
3-66-36-2
Gerch L.
Brouwer G.
7-646-2
Brown A.
Valkusz M.
7-56-4
Roelofse R.
Rapp A.
7-646-3
Kovacevic A.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Sigouin B.
Pervolarakis M.
3-66-36-2
Corwin F.
Mejia N.
4-66-46-1
Redlicki M.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Kavcic B.
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Nakashima B.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-746-1
Altmaier D.
Leite W.
6-07-5
Song E.
Blumberg W.
6-47-5
Kozlov S.
Carr S.
6-24-67-64