Sumit Nagal vs Ivan Nedelko — Pune CH Round of 16

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND3
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
RUS13
Ivan Nedelko
#916ATP
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Nagal S.
2-0
Nedelko I.
Nagal S.
2–
Nedelko I.
0–

Sumit Nagal advanced when Ivan Nedelko retired 2-0 in the Pune CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nedelko I.

Nedelko I.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Nedelko I.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Nedelko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
2
Break points saved·Dominant
69
18
Break points won·Slight edge
35
29
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Nedelko I.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[2]
Clarke J.[5]
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[5]
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Ramanathan R.[6]
7-686-2
Quarter-finals
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Van Rijthoven T.[14]
7-670-0
Ramanathan R.[6]
Nagal S.[3]
6-47-65
Duckworth J.[2]
Mukund S.[8]
7-54-67-5
Clarke J.[5]
Diez S.[4]
6-43-67-63
R16
Nagal S.[3]
Nedelko I.[13]
2-0
Van Rijthoven T.[14]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
4-67-56-3
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Sekiguchi S.[11]
6-26-4
Diez S.[4]
Klein B.[15]
6-06-2
Mukund S.[8]
Kirkin E.
6-06-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Sureshkumar M.
6-16-2
Ramanathan R.[6]
Ilkel C.[12]
6-36-4
Clarke J.[5]
Lee D.[9]
6-16-4
R32
Diez S.[4]
Takahashi Y.
6-26-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Sood C.
6-16-3
Mukund S.[8]
Matsui T.
6-26-3
Kirkin E.
Myneni S.[10]
3-67-56-4
Ramanathan R.[6]
Kalovelonis M.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Kalenichenko D.
6-37-63
Van Rijthoven T.[14]
Singh D.
6-36-1
Ilkel C.[12]
Vinayak Sharma K.
6-26-1
Nagal S.[3]
Goveas A.
6-37-65
Nedelko I.[13]
Sunish D.
6-35-76-2
Lee D.[9]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Klein B.[15]
Rawat S.
6-13-66-4
Sekiguchi S.[11]
Blokhin R.
6-36-0
Ortega Olmedo R.[7]
Chandrasekar A.
6-36-2
Sureshkumar M.
Noguchi R.[16]
6-37-64
Clarke J.[5]
Hemery C.
6-46-4
R64
Blokhin R.
Sood L.
6-46-2
Chandrasekar A.
Khabibulin T.
4-66-46-3
Kalovelonis M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-26-4
Sureshkumar M.
Bendre A.
6-26-0
Kalenichenko D.
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
7-636-3
Vinayak Sharma K.
Chaukulkar T.
7-616-756-4
Rawat S.
Kadhe A.
6-23-66-3
Goveas A.
Simon T.
6-47-64
Dougaz A.
Kalyanpur A.
6-37-63
Takahashi Y.
Vishwakarma S.
6-03-66-3
Singh D.
Anand K.
6-36-4
Kirkin E.
Pichler D.
1-67-56-2
Matsui T.
Patael B.
4-66-36-4
Sunish D.
Sumizawa D.
7-636-2
Hemery C.
Bobrov B.
6-16-4