Jason Jung vs Alexey Vatutin — Houston CH Round of 16

Houston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jason Jung
TPE5
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
RUS9
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1382Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Jung J.
7-5 6-2
Vatutin A.
Jung J.
762
Vatutin A.
520

Jason Jung defeated Alexey Vatutin 7-5 6-2 in the Houston CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexey Vatutin came in ranked #610, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jason Jung claimed a first win over Alexey Vatutin in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-01-15Australian OpenQ1hardAlexey Vatutin6-1 5-7 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
0
Break points saved·Dominant
64
18
Break points won·Clear edge
8
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
21
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Vatutin A.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Giron M.[4]
Karlovic I.[3]
7-56-757-69
Semi-finals
Karlovic I.[3]
Oconnell C.[6]
6-756-36-4
Giron M.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[6]
Mmoh M.[14]
5-0
Karlovic I.[3]
Galarneau A.
7-637-67
Giron M.[4]
Jung J.[5]
6-12-66-2
Krueger M.[8]
Redlicki M.[15]
6-46-4
R16
Oconnell C.[6]
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.[14]
Klahn B.[2]
5-77-657-65
Karlovic I.[3]
Bangoura S.[16]
7-652-66-4
Galarneau A.
Escobar G.
6-36-3
Jung J.[5]
Vatutin A.[9]
7-56-2
Giron M.[4]
Brooksby J.[13]
6-24-66-3
Krueger M.[8]
Krstin P.[12]
7-646-4
Redlicki M.[15]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-756-46-4
R32
Karlovic I.[3]
Caruana L.
7-56-4
Jung J.[5]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.[16]
Heller P.
0-66-46-2
Krueger M.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-2
Krstin P.[12]
Chappell N.
6-11-66-1
Klahn B.[2]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[14]
Sarmiento R.
4-66-46-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
Altamirano C.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[6]
Vavassori A.
6-35-76-4
Galarneau A.
Young D.[10]
3-66-36-0
Escobar G.
King D.[7]
7-637-5
Vatutin A.[9]
Hidalgo D.
1-67-56-3
Brooksby J.[13]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Giron M.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-776-2
Redlicki M.[15]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Leshem E.
6-37-5
R64
Hidalgo D.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-1
Leshem E.
Heyman C.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Ayeni O.
6-46-2
Sarmiento R.
King E.
4-66-47-5
Altamirano C.
Brymer G.
6-27-65
Vavassori A.
Franco Descotte M.
6-46-3
Caruana L.
Abdel Aziz M.
6-26-4
Heller P.
Ritschard A.
6-37-5
Galarneau A.
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-36-3
Escobar G.
Zhu E.
6-27-64
Nguyen D.
Sarkar S.
6-16-0
Villanueva G.
Matos R.
7-636-4
Holt B.
Sinclair C.
6-17-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Chappell N.
Fanselow S.
6-13-67-65
Nanda G.
Crawford O.
6-46-3