Sebastian Korda vs Emilio Gomez — Champaign-Urbana CH Round of 16

Champaign-Urbana CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sebastian Korda
USA14
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1765Hard ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
ECU3
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Korda S.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Gomez E.
Korda S.
4662
Gomez E.
6431

Sebastian Korda defeated Emilio Gomez 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Champaign-Urbana CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Korda S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Serve advantage — Korda S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Korda S.Gomez E.
61
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Korda S.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Korda S.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
77
Break points won·Dominant
73
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.[9]
Korda S.[14]
6-46-737-66
Semi-finals
Korda S.[14]
Brown A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.[9]
Kavcic B.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.[9]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Kavcic B.
Smith K.
7-636-3
Brown A.
Ficovich J.[8]
7-56-3
Korda S.[14]
Redlicki M.
6-24-67-64
R16
Korda S.[14]
Gomez E.[3]
4-66-46-3
Brown A.
Aragone J.[13]
7-656-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Cid R.[10]
6-47-66
Redlicki M.
Corwin F.
6-47-5
Smith K.
Torpegaard M.[4]
6-06-3
Wolf J.[9]
Eubanks C.[6]
7-54-66-4
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-44-66-1
Kavcic B.
Glasspool L.
7-57-65
R32
Cid R.[10]
Roelofse R.
5-76-36-3
Redlicki M.
Polansky P.[5]
4-66-16-4
Korda S.[14]
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Smith K.
Smith R.[16]
3-66-37-63
Brown A.
Rola B.[2]
6-766-36-4
Aragone J.[13]
Sels J.
6-23-66-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-1
Gomez E.[3]
Gerch L.
6-46-756-2
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.[12]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Cerundolo F.[7]
6-26-0
Glasspool L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-57-65
Torpegaard M.[4]
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
Eubanks C.[6]
Nakashima B.
6-47-65
Wolf J.[9]
Altmaier D.
6-27-63
Song E.
King K.[15]
6-47-63
Kozlov S.
Kudla D.[1]
6-36-3
R64
Smith K.
Pena Lopez M.
6-26-1
Sels J.
Avidzba A.
6-36-1
Svajda Z.
Hardt N.
6-06-1
Glasspool L.
Geerts M.
3-66-36-2
Gerch L.
Brouwer G.
7-646-2
Brown A.
Valkusz M.
7-56-4
Roelofse R.
Rapp A.
7-646-3
Kovacevic A.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Sigouin B.
Pervolarakis M.
3-66-36-2
Corwin F.
Mejia N.
4-66-46-1
Redlicki M.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Kavcic B.
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Nakashima B.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-746-1
Altmaier D.
Leite W.
6-07-5
Song E.
Blumberg W.
6-47-5
Kozlov S.
Carr S.
6-24-67-64