Marcos Giron vs Jason Jung — Houston CH Quarter-final

Houston CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marcos Giron
USA4
Marcos Giron
#87ATP
1718ELO
1704Hard ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
Jason Jung
TPE5
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Giron M.
6-1 2-6 6-2
Jung J.
Giron M.
6262
Jung J.
1621

Marcos Giron defeated Jason Jung 6-1 2-6 6-2 in the Houston CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Marcos Giron came in ranked #87, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Marcos Giron extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marcos Giron closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-10s HertogenboschQ1grassMarcos Giron6-2 5-7 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Giron M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Giron M.Jung J.
29
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Giron M.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giron M.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
62
21
Break points saved·Dominant
98
64
Break points won·Dominant
42
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Giron M.Jung J.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
75

Giron M.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Jung J.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Giron M.[4]
Karlovic I.[3]
7-56-757-69
Semi-finals
Karlovic I.[3]
Oconnell C.[6]
6-756-36-4
Giron M.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[6]
Mmoh M.[14]
5-0
Karlovic I.[3]
Galarneau A.
7-637-67
Giron M.[4]
Jung J.[5]
6-12-66-2
Krueger M.[8]
Redlicki M.[15]
6-46-4
R16
Oconnell C.[6]
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.[14]
Klahn B.[2]
5-77-657-65
Karlovic I.[3]
Bangoura S.[16]
7-652-66-4
Galarneau A.
Escobar G.
6-36-3
Jung J.[5]
Vatutin A.[9]
7-56-2
Giron M.[4]
Brooksby J.[13]
6-24-66-3
Krueger M.[8]
Krstin P.[12]
7-646-4
Redlicki M.[15]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-756-46-4
R32
Karlovic I.[3]
Caruana L.
7-56-4
Jung J.[5]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.[16]
Heller P.
0-66-46-2
Krueger M.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-2
Krstin P.[12]
Chappell N.
6-11-66-1
Klahn B.[2]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Mmoh M.[14]
Sarmiento R.
4-66-46-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[11]
Altamirano C.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[6]
Vavassori A.
6-35-76-4
Galarneau A.
Young D.[10]
3-66-36-0
Escobar G.
King D.[7]
7-637-5
Vatutin A.[9]
Hidalgo D.
1-67-56-3
Brooksby J.[13]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Giron M.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-776-2
Redlicki M.[15]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Leshem E.
6-37-5
R64
Hidalgo D.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-1
Leshem E.
Heyman C.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Ayeni O.
6-46-2
Sarmiento R.
King E.
4-66-47-5
Altamirano C.
Brymer G.
6-27-65
Vavassori A.
Franco Descotte M.
6-46-3
Caruana L.
Abdel Aziz M.
6-26-4
Heller P.
Ritschard A.
6-37-5
Galarneau A.
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-36-3
Escobar G.
Zhu E.
6-27-64
Nguyen D.
Sarkar S.
6-16-0
Villanueva G.
Matos R.
7-636-4
Holt B.
Sinclair C.
6-17-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Chappell N.
Fanselow S.
6-13-67-65
Nanda G.
Crawford O.
6-46-3