Norbert Gombos vs Nerman Fatic — Helsinki CH Round of 32

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Norbert Gombos
SVK4
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Gombos N.
6-2 6-3
Fatic N.
Gombos N.
662
Fatic N.
230

Norbert Gombos defeated Nerman Fatic 6-2 6-3 in the Helsinki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
63
Break points won·Dominant
8
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
24
Tiebreaks·Even
36
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Fatic N.
Freshness·
79
—

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ruusuvuori E.[10]
Safwat M.[14]
6-36-746-2
Semi-finals
Safwat M.[14]
Taberner C.[15]
6-16-3
Ruusuvuori E.[10]
Ivashka I.[8]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Ivashka I.[8]
Heliovaara H.
3-66-16-2
Safwat M.[14]
Ymer E.[7]
6-36-4
Taberner C.[15]
Stakhovsky S.[11]
7-656-3
Ruusuvuori E.[10]
Molcan A.
6-37-5
R16
Stakhovsky S.[11]
Roumane R.
6-35-76-3
Safwat M.[14]
Petit G.
6-16-3
Ymer E.[7]
Milojevic N.[12]
7-57-5
Taberner C.[15]
Niklas Salminen P.
3-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.[10]
Virtanen O.
6-16-1
Molcan A.
Gombos N.[4]
6-46-746-3
Ivashka I.[8]
Muller A.
6-46-3
Heliovaara H.
Grenier H.
6-16-3
R32
Stakhovsky S.[11]
Zverev M.
4-62-1
Taberner C.[15]
Celikbilek A.
3-66-37-64
Roumane R.
Maden Y.[6]
6-45-76-1
Virtanen O.
Fabbiano T.[5]
1-66-36-4
Molcan A.
Ferreira Silva F.[13]
6-46-726-1
Muller A.
Garcia Lopez G.[9]
6-36-3
Heliovaara H.
Moriya H.[16]
4-67-676-3
Ivashka I.[8]
Smith J.
2-66-46-4
Gombos N.[4]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Safwat M.[14]
Escoffier A.
6-46-2
Ymer E.[7]
Draper J.
6-33-66-4
Niklas Salminen P.
Poljak D.
6-44-66-3
Grenier H.
Karlovskiy E.[17]
7-56-2
Petit G.
Laaksonen H.[2]
4-66-46-4
Milojevic N.[12]
Pospisil J.
6-04-66-3
Ruusuvuori E.[10]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-2
R64
Niklas Salminen P.
Marchenko I.
6-42-0
Molcan A.
Mansouri S.
7-636-2
Grenier H.
Santanna B.
6-46-1
Smith J.
Lofman A.
6-26-1
Virtanen O.
Saatela L.
6-06-3
Blancaneaux G.
Kopriva V.
6-24-66-3
Escoffier A.
Mridha J.
7-54-67-67
Draper J.
Forejtek J.
3-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.
Kotov P.
7-57-67
Roumane R.
Ornago F.
6-46-726-3
Petit G.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-3
Pospisil J.
Sijsling I.
7-56-2
Zverev M.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Fatic N.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Durasovic V.
6-16-2
Heliovaara H.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-2