Blaz Kavcic vs Francisco Cerundolo — Champaign-Urbana CH Round of 32

Champaign-Urbana CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SLO
Blaz Kavcic
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2019
hard
Francisco Cerundolo
ARG7
Francisco Cerundolo
#22ATP
1931ELO
1880Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$11MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Kavcic B.
6-2 6-0
Cerundolo F.
Kavcic B.
662
Cerundolo F.
200

Blaz Kavcic defeated Francisco Cerundolo 6-2 6-0 in the Champaign-Urbana CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kavcic B.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cerundolo F.

Cerundolo F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kavcic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kavcic B.Cerundolo F.
—
Serve
13
—
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kavcic B.Cerundolo F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kavcic B.Cerundolo F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
88
Break points saved·Dominant
43
98
Break points won·Dominant
36
86
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kavcic B.Cerundolo F.
Freshness·
—
98

Cerundolo F.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.[9]
Korda S.[14]
6-46-737-66
Semi-finals
Korda S.[14]
Brown A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.[9]
Kavcic B.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.[9]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Kavcic B.
Smith K.
7-636-3
Brown A.
Ficovich J.[8]
7-56-3
Korda S.[14]
Redlicki M.
6-24-67-64
R16
Korda S.[14]
Gomez E.[3]
4-66-46-3
Brown A.
Aragone J.[13]
7-656-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Cid R.[10]
6-47-66
Redlicki M.
Corwin F.
6-47-5
Smith K.
Torpegaard M.[4]
6-06-3
Wolf J.[9]
Eubanks C.[6]
7-54-66-4
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-44-66-1
Kavcic B.
Glasspool L.
7-57-65
R32
Cid R.[10]
Roelofse R.
5-76-36-3
Redlicki M.
Polansky P.[5]
4-66-16-4
Korda S.[14]
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Smith K.
Smith R.[16]
3-66-37-63
Brown A.
Rola B.[2]
6-766-36-4
Aragone J.[13]
Sels J.
6-23-66-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-1
Gomez E.[3]
Gerch L.
6-46-756-2
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.[12]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Cerundolo F.[7]
6-26-0
Glasspool L.
Uchida K.[11]
7-57-65
Torpegaard M.[4]
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
Eubanks C.[6]
Nakashima B.
6-47-65
Wolf J.[9]
Altmaier D.
6-27-63
Song E.
King K.[15]
6-47-63
Kozlov S.
Kudla D.[1]
6-36-3
R64
Smith K.
Pena Lopez M.
6-26-1
Sels J.
Avidzba A.
6-36-1
Svajda Z.
Hardt N.
6-06-1
Glasspool L.
Geerts M.
3-66-36-2
Gerch L.
Brouwer G.
7-646-2
Brown A.
Valkusz M.
7-56-4
Roelofse R.
Rapp A.
7-646-3
Kovacevic A.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Sigouin B.
Pervolarakis M.
3-66-36-2
Corwin F.
Mejia N.
4-66-46-1
Redlicki M.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Kavcic B.
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Nakashima B.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-746-1
Altmaier D.
Leite W.
6-07-5
Song E.
Blumberg W.
6-47-5
Kozlov S.
Carr S.
6-24-67-64