Tim Van Rijthoven vs Tung Lin Wu — Kobe CH Round of 32

Kobe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2019
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE12
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Van Rijthoven T.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Wu T.
Van Rijthoven T.
626772
Wu T.
774631

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Kobe CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
84
Break points won·Slight edge
1
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van Rijthoven T.Wu T.
Freshness·
—
80

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Watanuki Y.
Sugita Y.[2]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[2]
Imai S.
6-34-66-1
Watanuki Y.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.
Nam J.[16]
6-42-2
Imai S.
Moriya H.[11]
6-37-64
Van Rijthoven T.
Soeda G.[3]
6-33-67-66
Sugita Y.[2]
Ramanathan R.[9]
6-26-3
R16
Van Rijthoven T.
Saville L.
7-627-68
Soeda G.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
0-66-37-5
Watanuki Y.
Ichikawa T.
6-26-1
Moriya H.[11]
Tseng C.
7-56-2
Sugita Y.[2]
Gabashvili T.
6-746-36-3
Ramanathan R.[9]
Clarke J.[8]
6-36-3
Imai S.
Tokuda R.
3-66-36-2
Nam J.[16]
Mochizuki Y.
6-31-66-1
R32
Tseng C.
Ito T.[5]
6-33-0
Mochizuki Y.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
7-53-2
Gabashvili T.
Santillan A.[14]
3-66-40-0
Watanuki Y.
Bai Y.[10]
6-36-1
Clarke J.[8]
Tanuma R.
6-33-66-3
Nam J.[16]
Patael B.
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[2]
Chung Y.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Onishi K.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Wu T.[12]
6-726-47-63
Ichikawa T.
Lopez Perez E.[7]
5-76-27-66
Tokuda R.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-26-2
Imai S.
Lee D.[15]
6-46-2
Moriya H.[11]
Hazawa S.
7-656-4
Shimabukuro S.
Li Z.[13]
3-67-656-4
Soeda G.[3]
Niklas Salminen P.
7-666-2
Ramanathan R.[9]
Yamasaki J.
6-46-1
R64
Tokuda R.
Kawahashi Y.
6-36-1
Yamasaki J.
Mousley B.
6-24-3
Chung Y.
Takahashi Y.
7-637-61
Mochizuki Y.
Ochi M.
2-66-23-0
Patael B.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-2
Tanuma R.
Niki T.
6-34-67-66
Tseng C.
Santanna B.
6-36-0
Gabashvili T.
Yang T.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Klein B.
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Saito T.
7-616-3
Niklas Salminen P.
Kadhe A.
7-686-3
Ichikawa T.
Khabibulin T.
6-06-2
Imai S.
Watanabe S.
6-46-2
Hazawa S.
Nakamura R.
7-646-0
Van Rijthoven T.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Watanuki Y.
Nishiwaki K.
6-36-4