Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Montevideo CH Round of 64

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2019
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Seyboth Wild T.
6-2 6-4
Ficovich J.
Seyboth Wild T.
662
Ficovich J.
240

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-2 6-4 in the Montevideo CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
76
Break points won·Clear edge
25
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
20
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Even
90
86

Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[5]
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
3-67-616-0
Delbonis F.[3]
Cerundolo J.
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Delbonis F.[3]
Martin A.[6]
6-37-68
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[8]
7-627-66
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-4
Munar J.[5]
Collarini A.[16]
4-66-36-1
R16
Collarini A.[16]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Martin A.[6]
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
4-2
Dellien H.[2]
Domingues J.[14]
6-36-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Coria F.[7]
6-26-1
Munar J.[5]
Kovalik J.[11]
4-67-56-3
Delbonis F.[3]
Mena F.[15]
6-36-767-63
Bagnis F.[8]
Baez S.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-37-66
R32
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-14-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Hanfmann Y.[12]
7-54-66-3
Munar J.[5]
Matos R.
6-32-66-4
Domingues J.[14]
Cerundolo F.
2-66-46-2
Dellien H.[2]
Mejia N.
1-66-36-1
Coria F.[7]
Lindell C.
6-17-63
Clezar G.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-666-766-3
Collarini A.[16]
Velotti A.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.[11]
Olivieri G.
7-6106-1
Martin A.[6]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-2
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
Jianu F.
6-25-76-4
Mena F.[15]
Zeballos F.
6-06-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Varillas J.[9]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.
Menezes J.[13]
7-647-5
Cuevas P.[1]
Olivo R.
7-636-0
R64
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
5-76-36-4
Mejia N.
Blanch U.
7-657-67
Clezar G.
Tabilo A.
3-66-36-3
Zeballos F.
Cuevas M.
0-67-667-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Diaz Acosta F.
1-66-16-4
Cerundolo F.
Gonzalez A.
6-26-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Ficovich J.
6-26-4
Lindell C.
Alvarez N.
6-26-4
Velotti A.
Leite W.
6-32-66-3
Matos R.
Villanueva G.
4-66-06-2
Sakamoto P.
Luz O.
6-46-3
Jianu F.
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Krstin P.
Roncadelli F.
6-36-0
Baez S.
Arias B.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Etcheverry T.
7-636-1