Pablo Cuevas vs Renzo Olivo — Montevideo CH Round of 32

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
URU1
Pablo Cuevas
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2019
clay
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Cuevas P.
7-6 6-0
Olivo R.
Cuevas P.
7762
Olivo R.
6300

Pablo Cuevas defeated Renzo Olivo 7-6 6-0 in the Montevideo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Pablo Cuevas came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's round of 32. Pablo Cuevas extended the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

Head to head

3–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-24SantiagoR16clayRenzo Olivo5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(8)
2016-07-11HamburgSFclayPablo Cuevas7-5 6-3
2014-07-21UmagQ3clayPablo Cuevas7-5 6-2
2014-07-07BastadQFclayPablo Cuevas6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas P.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas P.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
8
Break points saved·Dominant
93
33
Break points won·Clear edge
32
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
27
Tiebreaks·Even
44
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[5]
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
3-67-616-0
Delbonis F.[3]
Cerundolo J.
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Delbonis F.[3]
Martin A.[6]
6-37-68
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[8]
7-627-66
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-4
Munar J.[5]
Collarini A.[16]
4-66-36-1
R16
Collarini A.[16]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Martin A.[6]
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
4-2
Dellien H.[2]
Domingues J.[14]
6-36-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Coria F.[7]
6-26-1
Munar J.[5]
Kovalik J.[11]
4-67-56-3
Delbonis F.[3]
Mena F.[15]
6-36-767-63
Bagnis F.[8]
Baez S.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-37-66
R32
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-14-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Hanfmann Y.[12]
7-54-66-3
Munar J.[5]
Matos R.
6-32-66-4
Domingues J.[14]
Cerundolo F.
2-66-46-2
Dellien H.[2]
Mejia N.
1-66-36-1
Coria F.[7]
Lindell C.
6-17-63
Clezar G.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-666-766-3
Collarini A.[16]
Velotti A.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.[11]
Olivieri G.
7-6106-1
Martin A.[6]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-2
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
Jianu F.
6-25-76-4
Mena F.[15]
Zeballos F.
6-06-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Varillas J.[9]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.
Menezes J.[13]
7-647-5
Cuevas P.[1]
Olivo R.
7-636-0
R64
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
5-76-36-4
Mejia N.
Blanch U.
7-657-67
Clezar G.
Tabilo A.
3-66-36-3
Zeballos F.
Cuevas M.
0-67-667-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Diaz Acosta F.
1-66-16-4
Cerundolo F.
Gonzalez A.
6-26-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Ficovich J.
6-26-4
Lindell C.
Alvarez N.
6-26-4
Velotti A.
Leite W.
6-32-66-3
Matos R.
Villanueva G.
4-66-06-2
Sakamoto P.
Luz O.
6-46-3
Jianu F.
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Krstin P.
Roncadelli F.
6-36-0
Baez S.
Arias B.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Etcheverry T.
7-636-1