Gijs Brouwer vs Brandon Nakashima — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2019
hard
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
Brouwer G.
6-2 6-3
Nakashima B.
Brouwer G.
662
Nakashima B.
230

Gijs Brouwer defeated Brandon Nakashima 6-2 6-3 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Nakashima B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Brouwer G.Nakashima B.
—
Serve
61
—
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Nakashima B.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Nakashima B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
99
Break points won·Slight edge
6
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Nakashima B.
Freshness·Even
92
90

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.
Oconnell C.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.
Broady L.
6-27-65
Oconnell C.[8]
Paul T.[1]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Broady L.
Brouwer G.
6-31-66-3
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Oconnell C.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-726-46-4
Paul T.[1]
Rola B.[9]
2-66-17-64
R16
Kovacevic A.
Bangoura S.
6-44-66-4
Oconnell C.[8]
Polansky P.[11]
6-26-3
Rola B.[9]
Popko D.
6-46-4
Paul T.[1]
Pospisil V.[13]
6-40-0
Mmoh M.
Smith R.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Wolf J.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.
Nakashima B.
6-26-3
Broady L.
Gomez E.[10]
7-55-77-5
R32
Brouwer G.
Schnur B.[2]
7-56-3
Gomez E.[10]
Ritschard A.
3-66-16-2
Broady L.
Giron M.[7]
2-67-637-5
Kovacevic A.
Klahn B.[3]
3-67-676-4
Bangoura S.
Krueger M.[16]
3-67-646-4
Smith R.
Kudla D.[5]
7-656-2
Oconnell C.[8]
King K.
7-56-3
Polansky P.[11]
Leshem E.
6-27-5
Escobedo E.
Vatutin A.[15]
5-77-56-3
Wolf J.
Daniel T.[4]
7-666-4
Popko D.
Lorenzi P.[6]
4-66-26-4
Rola B.[9]
Vavassori A.
6-36-4
Pospisil V.[13]
Korda S.
6-46-4
Paul T.[1]
King E.
6-26-7107-61
Nakashima B.
Glasspool L.
7-653-67-65
Mmoh M.
King D.[12]
6-32-66-0
R64
Kovacevic A.
Uchida K.
7-57-5
Brouwer G.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Peliwo F.
6-26-2
Bangoura S.
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-796-3
Broady L.
Young D.
7-656-3
Escobedo E.
Aragone J.
7-6127-64
Ritschard A.
Svajda Z.
4-67-646-3
Mmoh M.
Cid R.
6-16-2
King K.
Hoyt E.
6-16-4
Wolf J.
Menendez Maceiras A.
2-66-36-2
Vavassori A.
Redlicki M.
7-6116-2
Korda S.
Peniston R.
6-777-56-0
King E.
Ponwith N.
5-76-46-2
Popko D.
Quiroz R.
6-7106-26-3
Leshem E.
Kavcic B.
6-27-62
Smith R.
Jones S.
6-33-66-4