Facundo Bagnis vs Sebastian Baez — Montevideo CH Round of 16

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG8
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2019
clay
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Bagnis F.
6-2 6-3
Baez S.
Bagnis F.
662
Baez S.
230

Facundo Bagnis defeated Sebastian Baez 6-2 6-3 in the Montevideo CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baez S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bagnis F.Baez S.
—
Serve
7
—
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Baez S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Baez S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
87
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Dominant
35
86
Deciding sets·Even
89
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Baez S.
Freshness·
—
100

Baez S.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[5]
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
3-67-616-0
Delbonis F.[3]
Cerundolo J.
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Delbonis F.[3]
Martin A.[6]
6-37-68
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[8]
7-627-66
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-4
Munar J.[5]
Collarini A.[16]
4-66-36-1
R16
Collarini A.[16]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Martin A.[6]
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
4-2
Dellien H.[2]
Domingues J.[14]
6-36-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Coria F.[7]
6-26-1
Munar J.[5]
Kovalik J.[11]
4-67-56-3
Delbonis F.[3]
Mena F.[15]
6-36-767-63
Bagnis F.[8]
Baez S.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-37-66
R32
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-14-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Hanfmann Y.[12]
7-54-66-3
Munar J.[5]
Matos R.
6-32-66-4
Domingues J.[14]
Cerundolo F.
2-66-46-2
Dellien H.[2]
Mejia N.
1-66-36-1
Coria F.[7]
Lindell C.
6-17-63
Clezar G.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-666-766-3
Collarini A.[16]
Velotti A.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.[11]
Olivieri G.
7-6106-1
Martin A.[6]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-2
Vilella Martinez M.[10]
Jianu F.
6-25-76-4
Mena F.[15]
Zeballos F.
6-06-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Varillas J.[9]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.
Menezes J.[13]
7-647-5
Cuevas P.[1]
Olivo R.
7-636-0
R64
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
5-76-36-4
Mejia N.
Blanch U.
7-657-67
Clezar G.
Tabilo A.
3-66-36-3
Zeballos F.
Cuevas M.
0-67-667-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Diaz Acosta F.
1-66-16-4
Cerundolo F.
Gonzalez A.
6-26-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Ficovich J.
6-26-4
Lindell C.
Alvarez N.
6-26-4
Velotti A.
Leite W.
6-32-66-3
Matos R.
Villanueva G.
4-66-06-2
Sakamoto P.
Luz O.
6-46-3
Jianu F.
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Krstin P.
Roncadelli F.
6-36-0
Baez S.
Arias B.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Etcheverry T.
7-636-1