Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Tobias Simon — Eckental CH Round of 64

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
GER
Tobias Simon
35 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Simon T.
Van De Zandschulp B.
666772
Simon T.
478651

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Tobias Simon 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Eckental CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Simon T.

Simon T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Simon T.
41
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Simon T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
14.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Simon T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
78
Break points won·Dominant
68
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Simon T.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vesely J.[7]
Darcis S.
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Darcis S.
Harris L.[3]
6-26-4
Vesely J.[7]
Karlovskiy E.
4-66-47-66
Quarter-finals
Darcis S.
Marchenko I.
6-747-636-3
Karlovskiy E.
Gojowczyk P.[4]
4-66-26-2
Vesely J.[7]
Van De Zandschulp B.
3-66-36-4
Harris L.[3]
Lacko L.
6-756-36-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[2]
7-634-67-62
Vesely J.[7]
Ivashka I.[9]
7-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ofner S.[16]
6-16-4
Karlovskiy E.
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
4-66-26-4
Harris L.[3]
Otte O.[15]
4-66-47-63
Lacko L.
Smith J.
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Kolar Z.
5-76-36-4
Darcis S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
3-66-27-5
R32
Otte O.[15]
Bemelmans R.
4-66-26-3
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ilkel C.
6-46-757-5
Ofner S.[16]
Rodionov J.
6-757-53-0
Lacko L.
Novak D.[8]
6-44-66-4
Smith J.
Rosol L.[12]
6-46-2
Harris L.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-26-4
Kolar Z.
Donskoy E.[6]
4-66-47-69
Majchrzak K.[1]
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vesely J.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
Lenz J.
7-54-66-4
Marchenko I.
Stakhovsky S.[10]
6-47-63
Laaksonen H.[2]
Cressy M.
6-45-77-63
Ivashka I.[9]
Machac T.
6-36-0
Darcis S.
Gaio F.[13]
6-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Troicki V.[14]
3-66-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Maden Y.[5]
6-46-3
R64
Van De Zandschulp B.
Simon T.
6-46-767-65
Machac T.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Kamke T.
Zverev M.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Schifris J.
6-46-2
Lenz J.
Durasovic V.
7-666-2
Karlovskiy E.
Masur D.
6-787-626-1
Lacko L.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Smith J.
Haerteis J.
7-636-727-65
Bemelmans R.
Karatsev A.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-56-4
Marchenko I.
Miedler L.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Ward J.
7-57-64
Rodionov J.
Zima L.
6-47-66
Cressy M.
Guttau N.
6-37-5
Kolar Z.
Galovic V.
6-26-2
Huesler M.
Basic M.
3-66-37-64