Vasek Pospisil vs Christopher Oconnell — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN10
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
AUS7
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Pospisil V.
6-3 6-2
Oconnell C.
Pospisil V.
662
Oconnell C.
320

Vasek Pospisil defeated Christopher Oconnell 6-3 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vasek Pospisil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-08DohaR32hardVasek Pospisil6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
—
Serve
20
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
49
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Clear edge
7
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
62
38
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
72
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[10]
Schnur B.[1]
7-623-66-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Nakashima B.
6-16-1
Schnur B.[1]
Popko D.[16]
3-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Peliwo F.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
6-776-16-3
Popko D.[16]
Giron M.[5]
6-36-4
Schnur B.[1]
Rola B.[6]
6-27-64
R16
Daniel T.[4]
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Peliwo F.
Krueger M.[15]
6-12-66-1
Pospisil V.[10]
Oconnell C.[7]
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.[12]
7-656-3
Giron M.[5]
King D.[9]
6-43-67-65
Popko D.[16]
Kudla D.[3]
4-67-656-1
Schnur B.[1]
Bangoura S.
7-656-2
Rola B.[6]
Caruana L.
6-36-2
R32
Kudla D.[3]
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Pospisil V.[10]
Kavcic B.
7-656-4
Daniel T.[4]
Soderlund C.
7-636-2
Novikov D.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Peliwo F.
Karlovic I.[2]
6-17-5
Krueger M.[15]
Korda S.
3-66-36-1
Oconnell C.[7]
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Janvier M.[12]
Redlicki M.
6-26-4
Giron M.[5]
King K.
4-66-26-4
King D.[9]
Mmoh M.
6-34-1
Popko D.[16]
Wolf J.
4-66-46-3
Caruana L.
Ross G.
7-646-1
Bangoura S.
Vatutin A.[14]
5-76-26-4
Schnur B.[1]
Song E.
3-66-16-4
Rola B.[6]
Sarmiento R.
7-56-2
Nakashima B.
Polansky P.[8]
6-44-66-1
R64
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
7-637-62
Bangoura S.
Sock J.
6-30-0
Kavcic B.
Young D.
6-37-62
Ritschard A.
Glasspool L.
6-46-4
Caruana L.
Smith R.
6-47-5
Peliwo F.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Korda S.
Sels J.
6-43-66-1
Bellucci T.
Leshem E.
7-56-4
Soderlund C.
Peniston R.
7-54-66-2
Redlicki M.
Brouwer G.
7-656-4
Nakashima B.
Escobedo E.
6-37-64
King K.
Dunbar J.
6-36-4
Wolf J.
Nanda G.
6-06-1
Aragone J.
Cid R.
6-26-3
Sarmiento R.
Broady L.
6-46-2
Song E.
Redlicki M.
7-57-5