Brandon Nakashima vs Peter Polansky — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
CAN8
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Nakashima B.
6-4 4-6 6-1
Polansky P.
Nakashima B.
6462
Polansky P.
4611

Brandon Nakashima defeated Peter Polansky 6-4 4-6 6-1 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Peter Polansky came in defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Nakashima came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Polansky P.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
82
Break points won·Even
13
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Polansky P.
Freshness·
90
—

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[10]
Schnur B.[1]
7-623-66-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Nakashima B.
6-16-1
Schnur B.[1]
Popko D.[16]
3-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Peliwo F.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
6-776-16-3
Popko D.[16]
Giron M.[5]
6-36-4
Schnur B.[1]
Rola B.[6]
6-27-64
R16
Daniel T.[4]
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Peliwo F.
Krueger M.[15]
6-12-66-1
Pospisil V.[10]
Oconnell C.[7]
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.[12]
7-656-3
Giron M.[5]
King D.[9]
6-43-67-65
Popko D.[16]
Kudla D.[3]
4-67-656-1
Schnur B.[1]
Bangoura S.
7-656-2
Rola B.[6]
Caruana L.
6-36-2
R32
Kudla D.[3]
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Pospisil V.[10]
Kavcic B.
7-656-4
Daniel T.[4]
Soderlund C.
7-636-2
Novikov D.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Peliwo F.
Karlovic I.[2]
6-17-5
Krueger M.[15]
Korda S.
3-66-36-1
Oconnell C.[7]
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Janvier M.[12]
Redlicki M.
6-26-4
Giron M.[5]
King K.
4-66-26-4
King D.[9]
Mmoh M.
6-34-1
Popko D.[16]
Wolf J.
4-66-46-3
Caruana L.
Ross G.
7-646-1
Bangoura S.
Vatutin A.[14]
5-76-26-4
Schnur B.[1]
Song E.
3-66-16-4
Rola B.[6]
Sarmiento R.
7-56-2
Nakashima B.
Polansky P.[8]
6-44-66-1
R64
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
7-637-62
Bangoura S.
Sock J.
6-30-0
Kavcic B.
Young D.
6-37-62
Ritschard A.
Glasspool L.
6-46-4
Caruana L.
Smith R.
6-47-5
Peliwo F.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Korda S.
Sels J.
6-43-66-1
Bellucci T.
Leshem E.
7-56-4
Soderlund C.
Peniston R.
7-54-66-2
Redlicki M.
Brouwer G.
7-656-4
Nakashima B.
Escobedo E.
6-37-64
King K.
Dunbar J.
6-36-4
Wolf J.
Nanda G.
6-06-1
Aragone J.
Cid R.
6-26-3
Sarmiento R.
Broady L.
6-46-2
Song E.
Redlicki M.
7-57-5