Christian Lindell vs Facundo Mena — Guayaquil CH Round of 64

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
SWE
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Lindell C.
7-6 6-2
Mena F.
Lindell C.
7762
Mena F.
6420

Christian Lindell defeated Facundo Mena 7-6 6-2 in the Guayaquil CH round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Christian Lindell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaQ1clayChristian Lindell6-1 0-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Lindell C.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Serve advantage — Mena F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lindell C.Mena F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lindell C.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
17
9
Break points saved·Even
54
57
Break points won·Clear edge
20
7
Deciding sets·Slight edge
34
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
21
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lindell C.Mena F.
Freshness·
—
70

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Varillas J.[12]
6-47-5
Dellien H.[1]
Coria F.[9]
6-36-737-60
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[1]
Bagnis F.[11]
7-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Mayer L.[2]
4-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo F.
7-647-5
Coria F.[9]
Hanfmann Y.[15]
4-67-56-4
R16
Mayer L.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-37-65
Varillas J.[12]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Kovalik J.[13]
6-33-66-3
Coria F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-47-68
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Munar J.[3]
6-46-0
Bagnis F.[11]
Sousa P.[6]
7-634-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Galan D.
6-25-77-5
R32
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Clezar G.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.[13]
Blanch U.
6-23-66-3
Quiroz R.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-757-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Luz O.
7-602-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-667-65
Coria F.[9]
Lindell C.
6-747-50-0
Lorenzi P.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-56-4
Cerundolo F.
Gomez E.[10]
6-43-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-2
Mayer L.[2]
Collarini A.
6-12-66-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Echazu M.
6-34-67-5
Munar J.[3]
Gutierrez O.
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Zeballos F.
6-16-3
Sousa P.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.[11]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Galan D.
Domingues J.[16]
7-633-66-3
R64
Lindell C.
Mena F.
7-646-2
Collarini A.
Zederbauer A.
6-26-2
Galan D.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-56-2
Villanueva G.
March C.
6-46-3
Quiroz R.
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Luz O.
Ficovich J.
6-37-64
Blanch U.
Hidalgo D.
6-26-4
Clezar G.
Alvarez N.
6-26-3
Krstin P.
Matos R.
6-766-36-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Gonzalez A.
4-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Leite W.
6-46-1
Cerundolo F.
Chazal M.
7-646-2
Zeballos F.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-4
Gutierrez O.
Sakamoto P.
3-67-636-4
Etcheverry T.
Velotti A.
6-26-3