Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Wilson Leite — Guayaquil CH Round of 64

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
clay
BRA
Wilson Leite
#750ATP
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Seyboth Wild T.
6-4 6-1
Leite W.
Seyboth Wild T.
662
Leite W.
410

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Wilson Leite 6-4 6-1 in the Guayaquil CH round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Thiago Seyboth Wild came in ranked #284, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Leite W.

Leite W.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Serve advantage — Seyboth Wild T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Leite W.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 161). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Leite W.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
0
Break points saved·Dominant
93
19
Break points won·Clear edge
25
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
8
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Leite W.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
100

Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Leite W.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Varillas J.[12]
6-47-5
Dellien H.[1]
Coria F.[9]
6-36-737-60
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[1]
Bagnis F.[11]
7-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Mayer L.[2]
4-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo F.
7-647-5
Coria F.[9]
Hanfmann Y.[15]
4-67-56-4
R16
Mayer L.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-37-65
Varillas J.[12]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Kovalik J.[13]
6-33-66-3
Coria F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-47-68
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Munar J.[3]
6-46-0
Bagnis F.[11]
Sousa P.[6]
7-634-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Galan D.
6-25-77-5
R32
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Clezar G.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.[13]
Blanch U.
6-23-66-3
Quiroz R.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-757-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Luz O.
7-602-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-667-65
Coria F.[9]
Lindell C.
6-747-50-0
Lorenzi P.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-56-4
Cerundolo F.
Gomez E.[10]
6-43-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-2
Mayer L.[2]
Collarini A.
6-12-66-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Echazu M.
6-34-67-5
Munar J.[3]
Gutierrez O.
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Zeballos F.
6-16-3
Sousa P.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.[11]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Galan D.
Domingues J.[16]
7-633-66-3
R64
Lindell C.
Mena F.
7-646-2
Collarini A.
Zederbauer A.
6-26-2
Galan D.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-56-2
Villanueva G.
March C.
6-46-3
Quiroz R.
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Luz O.
Ficovich J.
6-37-64
Blanch U.
Hidalgo D.
6-26-4
Clezar G.
Alvarez N.
6-26-3
Krstin P.
Matos R.
6-766-36-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Gonzalez A.
4-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Leite W.
6-46-1
Cerundolo F.
Chazal M.
7-646-2
Zeballos F.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-4
Gutierrez O.
Sakamoto P.
3-67-636-4
Etcheverry T.
Velotti A.
6-26-3