Filip Peliwo vs Mitchell Krueger — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA15
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Peliwo F.
6-1 2-6 6-1
Krueger M.
Peliwo F.
6262
Krueger M.
1611

Filip Peliwo defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-1 2-6 6-1 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in ranked #364, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Peliwo closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peliwo F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Serve advantage — Krueger M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peliwo F.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (132 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peliwo F.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
16
Break points saved·Dominant
23
87
Break points won·Even
11
14
Deciding sets·Even
10
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Peliwo F.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[10]
Schnur B.[1]
7-623-66-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Nakashima B.
6-16-1
Schnur B.[1]
Popko D.[16]
3-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Peliwo F.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
6-776-16-3
Popko D.[16]
Giron M.[5]
6-36-4
Schnur B.[1]
Rola B.[6]
6-27-64
R16
Daniel T.[4]
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Peliwo F.
Krueger M.[15]
6-12-66-1
Pospisil V.[10]
Oconnell C.[7]
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.[12]
7-656-3
Giron M.[5]
King D.[9]
6-43-67-65
Popko D.[16]
Kudla D.[3]
4-67-656-1
Schnur B.[1]
Bangoura S.
7-656-2
Rola B.[6]
Caruana L.
6-36-2
R32
Kudla D.[3]
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Pospisil V.[10]
Kavcic B.
7-656-4
Daniel T.[4]
Soderlund C.
7-636-2
Novikov D.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Peliwo F.
Karlovic I.[2]
6-17-5
Krueger M.[15]
Korda S.
3-66-36-1
Oconnell C.[7]
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Janvier M.[12]
Redlicki M.
6-26-4
Giron M.[5]
King K.
4-66-26-4
King D.[9]
Mmoh M.
6-34-1
Popko D.[16]
Wolf J.
4-66-46-3
Caruana L.
Ross G.
7-646-1
Bangoura S.
Vatutin A.[14]
5-76-26-4
Schnur B.[1]
Song E.
3-66-16-4
Rola B.[6]
Sarmiento R.
7-56-2
Nakashima B.
Polansky P.[8]
6-44-66-1
R64
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
7-637-62
Bangoura S.
Sock J.
6-30-0
Kavcic B.
Young D.
6-37-62
Ritschard A.
Glasspool L.
6-46-4
Caruana L.
Smith R.
6-47-5
Peliwo F.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Korda S.
Sels J.
6-43-66-1
Bellucci T.
Leshem E.
7-56-4
Soderlund C.
Peniston R.
7-54-66-2
Redlicki M.
Brouwer G.
7-656-4
Nakashima B.
Escobedo E.
6-37-64
King K.
Dunbar J.
6-36-4
Wolf J.
Nanda G.
6-06-1
Aragone J.
Cid R.
6-26-3
Sarmiento R.
Broady L.
6-46-2
Song E.
Redlicki M.
7-57-5