Tomas Machac vs Pavel Kotov — Eckental CH Round of 64

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
Pavel Kotov
RUS
Pavel Kotov
#246ATP
1597ELO
1601Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Machac T.
6-3 6-4
Kotov P.
Machac T.
662
Kotov P.
340

Tomas Machac defeated Pavel Kotov 6-3 6-4 in the Eckental CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Kotov P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Kotov P.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Kotov P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Kotov P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
59
Break points saved·Even
98
94
Break points won·Dominant
80
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vesely J.[7]
Darcis S.
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Darcis S.
Harris L.[3]
6-26-4
Vesely J.[7]
Karlovskiy E.
4-66-47-66
Quarter-finals
Darcis S.
Marchenko I.
6-747-636-3
Karlovskiy E.
Gojowczyk P.[4]
4-66-26-2
Vesely J.[7]
Van De Zandschulp B.
3-66-36-4
Harris L.[3]
Lacko L.
6-756-36-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[2]
7-634-67-62
Vesely J.[7]
Ivashka I.[9]
7-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ofner S.[16]
6-16-4
Karlovskiy E.
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
4-66-26-4
Harris L.[3]
Otte O.[15]
4-66-47-63
Lacko L.
Smith J.
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Kolar Z.
5-76-36-4
Darcis S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
3-66-27-5
R32
Otte O.[15]
Bemelmans R.
4-66-26-3
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ilkel C.
6-46-757-5
Ofner S.[16]
Rodionov J.
6-757-53-0
Lacko L.
Novak D.[8]
6-44-66-4
Smith J.
Rosol L.[12]
6-46-2
Harris L.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-26-4
Kolar Z.
Donskoy E.[6]
4-66-47-69
Majchrzak K.[1]
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vesely J.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
Lenz J.
7-54-66-4
Marchenko I.
Stakhovsky S.[10]
6-47-63
Laaksonen H.[2]
Cressy M.
6-45-77-63
Ivashka I.[9]
Machac T.
6-36-0
Darcis S.
Gaio F.[13]
6-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Troicki V.[14]
3-66-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Maden Y.[5]
6-46-3
R64
Van De Zandschulp B.
Simon T.
6-46-767-65
Machac T.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Kamke T.
Zverev M.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Schifris J.
6-46-2
Lenz J.
Durasovic V.
7-666-2
Karlovskiy E.
Masur D.
6-787-626-1
Lacko L.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Smith J.
Haerteis J.
7-636-727-65
Bemelmans R.
Karatsev A.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-56-4
Marchenko I.
Miedler L.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Ward J.
7-57-64
Rodionov J.
Zima L.
6-47-66
Cressy M.
Guttau N.
6-37-5
Kolar Z.
Galovic V.
6-26-2
Huesler M.
Basic M.
3-66-37-64