Andrew Harris vs Dane Sweeny — Playford CH Round of 32

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS6
Andrew Harris
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Harris A.
6-3 6-2
Sweeny D.
Harris A.
662
Sweeny D.
320

Andrew Harris defeated Dane Sweeny 6-3 6-2 in the Playford CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrew Harris came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Harris A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris A.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris A.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
45
Break points saved·Dominant
44
69
Break points won·Slight edge
16
11
Deciding sets·Slight edge
62
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
52
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Harris A.Sweeny D.
Freshness·
—
98

Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[2]
Uchiyama Y.[1]
7-626-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Ito T.[3]
7-52-0
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Polmans M.[4]
6-47-67
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Harris A.[6]
4-63-1
Ito T.[3]
Bolt A.[5]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Clarke J.[7]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Saville L.
3-66-16-0
R16
Ito T.[3]
Mott B.
6-47-67
Duckworth J.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-16-3
Clarke J.[7]
Heliovaara H.
6-46-3
Bolt A.[5]
Moriya H.[11]
6-46-0
Saville L.
Santillan A.[12]
3-67-626-2
Polmans M.[4]
Sekiguchi S.[14]
6-36-4
Harris A.[6]
Purcell M.[9]
4-67-56-2
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-36-4
R32
Bolt A.[5]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-37-63
Harris A.[6]
Sweeny D.
6-36-2
Sekiguchi S.[14]
Romios M.
6-36-1
Heliovaara H.
Mukund S.[10]
7-646-3
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Hardt N.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Crnokrak A.
6-37-5
Schoolkate T.
Vukic A.[13]
7-54-66-4
Clarke J.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-726-47-5
Ito T.[3]
Klein B.
6-46-4
Mott B.
Bourchier H.[16]
4-66-26-2
Moriya H.[11]
King E.
7-656-4
Saville L.
Tabilo A.[8]
3-66-46-1
Santillan A.[12]
Brymer G.
6-16-3
Polmans M.[4]
Grills J.
6-44-66-3
Purcell M.[9]
Zakharov A.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.[15]
Fanselow S.
7-656-2
R64
Klein B.
Kelly D.
4-0
Fancutt T.
Ma W.
6-46-1
Fanselow S.
Green C.
6-47-63
Romios M.
Barclay D.
1-66-37-65
Saville L.
Gerch L.
7-626-3
Heliovaara H.
Ibrahim J.
6-16-2
Crnokrak A.
Castelnuovo L.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Dellavedova M.
6-36-2
Mott B.
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-5
King E.
Puttergill C.
6-06-2
Niklas Salminen P.
Banes M.
6-36-2
Brymer G.
Mousley B.
6-26-1
Grills J.
Walkin B.
7-646-1
Sweeny D.
Bosnjak M.
6-37-67
Zakharov A.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-56-2