Yannick Hanfmann vs Jaume Munar — Guayaquil CH Round of 16

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yannick Hanfmann
GER15
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1741Clay ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
clay
Jaume Munar
ESP3
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1706Clay ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Hanfmann Y.
6-4 6-0
Munar J.
Hanfmann Y.
662
Munar J.
400

Yannick Hanfmann defeated Jaume Munar 6-4 6-0 in the Guayaquil CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jaume Munar came in ranked #44, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Yannick Hanfmann narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-22KitzbuhelR32clayYannick Hanfmann6-3 6-4
2024-04-08Monte Carlo MastersQ2clayJaume Munar6-7(7) 6-1 7-5
2018-07-30KitzbuhelR32clayJaume Munar2-6 7-6(5) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Hanfmann Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Munar J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Hanfmann Y.Munar J.
60
Serve
—
40
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hanfmann Y.Munar J.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hanfmann Y.Munar J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
50
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Dominant
26
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
30
Tiebreaks·Even
42
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hanfmann Y.Munar J.
Freshness·Clear edge
93
78

Hanfmann Y.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Munar J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Varillas J.[12]
6-47-5
Dellien H.[1]
Coria F.[9]
6-36-737-60
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[1]
Bagnis F.[11]
7-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Mayer L.[2]
4-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo F.
7-647-5
Coria F.[9]
Hanfmann Y.[15]
4-67-56-4
R16
Mayer L.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-37-65
Varillas J.[12]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Kovalik J.[13]
6-33-66-3
Coria F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-47-68
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Munar J.[3]
6-46-0
Bagnis F.[11]
Sousa P.[6]
7-634-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Galan D.
6-25-77-5
R32
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Clezar G.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.[13]
Blanch U.
6-23-66-3
Quiroz R.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-757-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Luz O.
7-602-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-667-65
Coria F.[9]
Lindell C.
6-747-50-0
Lorenzi P.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-56-4
Cerundolo F.
Gomez E.[10]
6-43-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-2
Mayer L.[2]
Collarini A.
6-12-66-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Echazu M.
6-34-67-5
Munar J.[3]
Gutierrez O.
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Zeballos F.
6-16-3
Sousa P.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.[11]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Galan D.
Domingues J.[16]
7-633-66-3
R64
Lindell C.
Mena F.
7-646-2
Collarini A.
Zederbauer A.
6-26-2
Galan D.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-56-2
Villanueva G.
March C.
6-46-3
Quiroz R.
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Luz O.
Ficovich J.
6-37-64
Blanch U.
Hidalgo D.
6-26-4
Clezar G.
Alvarez N.
6-26-3
Krstin P.
Matos R.
6-766-36-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Gonzalez A.
4-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Leite W.
6-46-1
Cerundolo F.
Chazal M.
7-646-2
Zeballos F.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-4
Gutierrez O.
Sakamoto P.
3-67-636-4
Etcheverry T.
Velotti A.
6-26-3