Peter Gojowczyk vs Cem Ilkel — Eckental CH Round of 32

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER4
Peter Gojowczyk
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Gojowczyk P.
6-4 6-7 7-5
Ilkel C.
Gojowczyk P.
66572
Ilkel C.
47751

Peter Gojowczyk defeated Cem Ilkel 6-4 6-7 7-5 in the Eckental CH round of 32 on hard. Peter Gojowczyk extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-06StuttgartQ1grassPeter Gojowczyk6-3 6-1
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ1hardCem Ilkel6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gojowczyk P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojowczyk P.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
53%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojowczyk P.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
32
Break points saved·Dominant
89
49
Break points won·Dominant
35
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vesely J.[7]
Darcis S.
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Darcis S.
Harris L.[3]
6-26-4
Vesely J.[7]
Karlovskiy E.
4-66-47-66
Quarter-finals
Darcis S.
Marchenko I.
6-747-636-3
Karlovskiy E.
Gojowczyk P.[4]
4-66-26-2
Vesely J.[7]
Van De Zandschulp B.
3-66-36-4
Harris L.[3]
Lacko L.
6-756-36-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[2]
7-634-67-62
Vesely J.[7]
Ivashka I.[9]
7-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ofner S.[16]
6-16-4
Karlovskiy E.
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
4-66-26-4
Harris L.[3]
Otte O.[15]
4-66-47-63
Lacko L.
Smith J.
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Kolar Z.
5-76-36-4
Darcis S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
3-66-27-5
R32
Otte O.[15]
Bemelmans R.
4-66-26-3
Gojowczyk P.[4]
Ilkel C.
6-46-757-5
Ofner S.[16]
Rodionov J.
6-757-53-0
Lacko L.
Novak D.[8]
6-44-66-4
Smith J.
Rosol L.[12]
6-46-2
Harris L.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-26-4
Kolar Z.
Donskoy E.[6]
4-66-47-69
Majchrzak K.[1]
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vesely J.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
Lenz J.
7-54-66-4
Marchenko I.
Stakhovsky S.[10]
6-47-63
Laaksonen H.[2]
Cressy M.
6-45-77-63
Ivashka I.[9]
Machac T.
6-36-0
Darcis S.
Gaio F.[13]
6-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Troicki V.[14]
3-66-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Maden Y.[5]
6-46-3
R64
Van De Zandschulp B.
Simon T.
6-46-767-65
Machac T.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Kamke T.
Zverev M.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Schifris J.
6-46-2
Lenz J.
Durasovic V.
7-666-2
Karlovskiy E.
Masur D.
6-787-626-1
Lacko L.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Smith J.
Haerteis J.
7-636-727-65
Bemelmans R.
Karatsev A.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-56-4
Marchenko I.
Miedler L.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Ward J.
7-57-64
Rodionov J.
Zima L.
6-47-66
Cressy M.
Guttau N.
6-37-5
Kolar Z.
Galovic V.
6-26-2
Huesler M.
Basic M.
3-66-37-64